Tools & Wizards About Us

Report Summary

  • 40

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    59% of other websites

  • 62

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 28% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 73

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    31% of websites

bugstoppers.com

Pest Control Palm Beach Gardens | Pest Control Jupiter | Pest Control Tequesta

Page Load Speed

2.1 sec in total

First Response

930 ms

Resources Loaded

1.2 sec

Page Rendered

1 ms

About Website

Visit bugstoppers.com now to see the best up-to-date Bugstoppers content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about bugstoppers.com

Bugstoppers is the top-rated pest control palm beach gardens, pest control jupiter, pest control tequesta, pest control northern palm beach county and exterminator in northern palm beach county. Pleas...

Visit bugstoppers.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Bugstoppers.com page load time and found that the first response time was 930 ms and then it took 1.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 25% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

bugstoppers.com performance score

40

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.5 s

68/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.9 s

29/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value2.5 s

98/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value990 ms

28/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.513

15/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value7.1 s

51/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

bugstoppers.com

930 ms

style.css

58 ms

yahoo.js

7 ms

dom.js

22 ms

container.js

22 ms

Our browser made a total of 15 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 20% of them (3 requests) were addressed to the original Bugstoppers.com, 67% (10 requests) were made to Developer.yahoo.com and 7% (1 request) were made to Cdnjs.cloudflare.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (930 ms) belongs to the original domain Bugstoppers.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 62.5 kB (88%)

Content Size

70.8 kB

After Optimization

8.3 kB

  • HTML
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Bugstoppers.com main page is 70.8 kB. This result falls within a vast category (top 1 000 000) of heavyweight, probably not optimized, and thus slow loading web pages. Only 5% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 68.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-66%

Potential reduce by 964 B

  • Original 1.5 kB
  • After minification 1.4 kB
  • After compression 496 B

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 964 B or 66% of the original size.

JavaScript Optimization

-89%

Potential reduce by 61.0 kB

  • Original 68.6 kB
  • After minification 51.8 kB
  • After compression 7.6 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 61.0 kB or 89% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-76%

Potential reduce by 536 B

  • Original 701 B
  • After minification 559 B
  • After compression 165 B

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Bugstoppers.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 536 B or 76% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

4

After Optimization

4

  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 4 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Bugstoppers. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Network Requests Diagram

Accessibility Review

bugstoppers.com accessibility score

62

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Document doesn't have a <title> element

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Some elements have a [tabindex] value greater than 0

Best Practices

bugstoppers.com best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

bugstoppers.com SEO score

73

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Document doesn't have a <title> element

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    ISO-8859-1

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Bugstoppers.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Bugstoppers.com main page’s claimed encoding is iso-8859-1. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Bugstoppers. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: