Access burnmarketing.com. Home

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.5 s

67/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value5.2 s

23/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value5.4 s

56/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value270 ms

82/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.489

17/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value7.1 s

52/100

10%

www.burnmarketing.com

1103 ms

auto-blocking.js

246 ms

main.min.css

456 ms

module_72131948535_two-col-content-srcset_copy.min.css

483 ms

module_69815671767_social-follow.min.css

476 ms

Our browser made a total of 37 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 78% of them (29 requests) were addressed to the original Burnmarketing.com, 3% (1 request) were made to Googletagmanager.com and 3% (1 request) were made to Static.hsappstatic.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.1 sec) belongs to the original domain Burnmarketing.com.

Content Size

367.7 kB

After Optimization

290.6 kB

In fact, the total size of Burnmarketing.com main page is 367.7 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 15% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 226.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 54.3 kB

Original 66.5 kB
After minification 61.8 kB
After compression 12.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 54.3 kB or 82% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-6%

Potential reduce by 13.5 kB

Original 226.0 kB
After minification 212.4 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Burnmarketing images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-12%

Potential reduce by 8.1 kB

Original 67.3 kB
After minification 67.3 kB
After compression 59.1 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 8.1 kB or 12% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-14%

Potential reduce by 1.1 kB

Original 8.0 kB
After minification 8.0 kB
After compression 6.8 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Burnmarketing.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 1.1 kB or 14% of the original size.

Requests Now

After Optimization

The browser has sent 33 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Burnmarketing. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 14 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.