Tools & Wizards About Us

Report Summary

  • 46

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    64% of other websites

  • 59

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 26% of websites

  • 58

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    20% of websites

  • 83

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    46% of websites

buxator.com

buxator.com - buxator Resources and Information.

Page Load Speed

1.3 sec in total

First Response

256 ms

Resources Loaded

980 ms

Page Rendered

96 ms

About Website

Visit buxator.com now to see the best up-to-date Buxator content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about buxator.com

buxator.com is your first and best source for all of the information you’re looking for. From general topics to more of what you would expect to find here, buxator.com has it all. We hope you find wha...

Visit buxator.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Buxator.com page load time and found that the first response time was 256 ms and then it took 1.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 25% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

buxator.com performance score

46

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.5 s

14/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value27.8 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value5.8 s

49/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value0 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.191

64/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value26.9 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

index.php

256 ms

common.js

94 ms

tugsdhvses1244ggjgegrgw24.com

358 ms

Our browser made a total of 3 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 67% of them (2 requests) were addressed to the original Buxator.com, 33% (1 request) were made to Tugsdhvses1244ggjgegrgw24.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (358 ms) relates to the external source Tugsdhvses1244ggjgegrgw24.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 853 B (41%)

Content Size

2.1 kB

After Optimization

1.2 kB

  • HTML
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of Buxator.com main page is 2.1 kB. This result falls within a big category (top 100 000) of medium weight web pages. Only a small number of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 1.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-50%

Potential reduce by 680 B

  • Original 1.4 kB
  • After minification 1.4 kB
  • After compression 685 B

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 680 B or 50% of the original size.

JavaScript Optimization

-24%

Potential reduce by 173 B

  • Original 736 B
  • After minification 736 B
  • After compression 563 B

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 173 B or 24% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

1

After Optimization

1

  • JavaScript

The browser has sent 1 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Buxator. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Network Requests Diagram

Accessibility Review

buxator.com accessibility score

59

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<dl>'s do not contain only properly-ordered <dt> and <dd> groups, <script>, <template> or <div> elements.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

buxator.com best practices score

58

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools

SEO Factors

buxator.com SEO score

83

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    GB2312

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Buxator.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Buxator.com main page’s claimed encoding is gb2312. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Buxator. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: