2 sec in total
89 ms
1.5 sec
362 ms
Visit byteboard.dev now to see the best up-to-date Byteboard content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about byteboard.dev
Our online coding interview platform makes hiring software engineers faster, more efficient, and more fair.
Visit byteboard.devWe analyzed Byteboard.dev page load time and found that the first response time was 89 ms and then it took 1.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.
byteboard.dev performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value5.0 s
9/100
10%
Value7.6 s
3/100
25%
Value5.9 s
48/100
10%
Value420 ms
65/100
30%
Value0.119
84/100
15%
Value7.5 s
47/100
10%
89 ms
35 ms
439 ms
70 ms
77 ms
Our browser made a total of 75 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 4% of them (3 requests) were addressed to the original Byteboard.dev, 67% (50 requests) were made to Assets-global.website-files.com and 7% (5 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (662 ms) relates to the external source Log.cookieyes.com.
Page size can be reduced by 342.1 kB (26%)
1.3 MB
952.7 kB
In fact, the total size of Byteboard.dev main page is 1.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.0 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 66.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 66.2 kB or 80% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 273.5 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Byteboard needs image optimization as it can save up to 273.5 kB or 26% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 465 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 2.0 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Byteboard.dev has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 9 (15%)
60
51
The browser has sent 60 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Byteboard. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 7 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
{{url}}
{{time}} ms
byteboard.dev accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Elements with an ARIA [role] that require children to contain a specific [role] are missing some or all of those required children.
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Internationalization and localization
These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.
Impact
Issue
<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
byteboard.dev best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
byteboard.dev SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Byteboard.dev can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Byteboard.dev main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
{{og_description}}
byteboard.dev
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Byteboard. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: