Tools & Wizards About Us

Report Summary

  • 49

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    67% of other websites

  • 85

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 58% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 90

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    68% of websites

pillowcovers.bookmarking.site

Quality Dofollow Social Bookmarking Sites List 2021

Page Load Speed

1.6 sec in total

First Response

187 ms

Resources Loaded

1.1 sec

Page Rendered

311 ms

About Website

Welcome to pillowcovers.bookmarking.site homepage info - get ready to check Pillowcovers Bookmarking best content for India right away, or after learning these important things about pillowcovers.bookmarking.site

iPt.pw is an open source content management system that lets you easily <a href='http://iPt.pw'>create your own user-powered website</a>.

Visit pillowcovers.bookmarking.site

Key Findings

We analyzed Pillowcovers.bookmarking.site page load time and found that the first response time was 187 ms and then it took 1.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 30% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

pillowcovers.bookmarking.site performance score

49

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.4 s

38/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.4 s

67/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value5.3 s

58/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,280 ms

18/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value10.2 s

25/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

pillowcovers.bookmarking.site

187 ms

www.pillowcovers.bookmarking.site

341 ms

bootstrap.no-icons.min.css

133 ms

bootstrap-theme.min.css

121 ms

font-awesome.min.css

126 ms

Our browser made a total of 80 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 21% of them (17 requests) were addressed to the original Pillowcovers.bookmarking.site, 60% (48 requests) were made to I.imgur.com and 6% (5 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (341 ms) belongs to the original domain Pillowcovers.bookmarking.site.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 115.7 kB (39%)

Content Size

293.9 kB

After Optimization

178.1 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Pillowcovers.bookmarking.site main page is 293.9 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 135.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-85%

Potential reduce by 98.0 kB

  • Original 114.6 kB
  • After minification 94.1 kB
  • After compression 16.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 20.5 kB, which is 18% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 98.0 kB or 85% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-10%

Potential reduce by 397 B

  • Original 4.1 kB
  • After minification 3.8 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Pillowcovers Bookmarking images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-5%

Potential reduce by 6.4 kB

  • Original 135.5 kB
  • After minification 135.5 kB
  • After compression 129.1 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-28%

Potential reduce by 11.0 kB

  • Original 39.6 kB
  • After minification 39.6 kB
  • After compression 28.6 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Pillowcovers.bookmarking.site needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 11.0 kB or 28% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 68 (89%)

Requests Now

76

After Optimization

8

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 76 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Pillowcovers Bookmarking. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 13 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

Accessibility Review

pillowcovers.bookmarking.site accessibility score

85

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Some elements have a [tabindex] value greater than 0

Best Practices

pillowcovers.bookmarking.site best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

pillowcovers.bookmarking.site SEO score

90

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document doesn't use legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Pillowcovers.bookmarking.site can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Pillowcovers.bookmarking.site main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Pillowcovers Bookmarking. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: