Tools & Wizards About Us

Report Summary

  • 39

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    58% of other websites

  • 89

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 71% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 99

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    93% of websites

canterburytravel.com

Lapland Holidays 2023, 2024 - Short Breaks & Day Trips

Page Load Speed

2.1 sec in total

First Response

129 ms

Resources Loaded

1.6 sec

Page Rendered

382 ms

About Website

Visit canterburytravel.com now to see the best up-to-date Canterburytravel content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about canterburytravel.com

Looking for Lapland Holiday in 2023 or 2024? You will find it here. Treat your family to an award winning, fully inclusive Santa Holiday.

Visit canterburytravel.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Canterburytravel.com page load time and found that the first response time was 129 ms and then it took 2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

canterburytravel.com performance score

39

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.2 s

43/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value7.9 s

3/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.8 s

68/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,030 ms

26/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.008

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value7.6 s

46/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

canterburytravel.com

129 ms

www.canterburytravel.com

561 ms

owl.carousel.vs202310171111931221.css

31 ms

style.vs202310171111931221.css

134 ms

modal.vs202310171111931221.css

35 ms

Our browser made a total of 50 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 40% of them (20 requests) were addressed to the original Canterburytravel.com, 36% (18 requests) were made to Stewarttravel.imgix.net and 8% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (610 ms) relates to the external source Static.hotjar.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 516.1 kB (45%)

Content Size

1.2 MB

After Optimization

635.2 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Canterburytravel.com main page is 1.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 599.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-86%

Potential reduce by 515.2 kB

  • Original 599.2 kB
  • After minification 598.9 kB
  • After compression 84.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 515.2 kB or 86% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 199 B

  • Original 447.0 kB
  • After minification 446.8 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Canterburytravel images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 320 B

  • Original 72.6 kB
  • After minification 72.6 kB
  • After compression 72.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 353 B

  • Original 32.4 kB
  • After minification 32.4 kB
  • After compression 32.1 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Canterburytravel.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 23 (51%)

Requests Now

45

After Optimization

22

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 45 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Canterburytravel. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 16 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 9 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

Accessibility Review

canterburytravel.com accessibility score

89

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

High

<object> elements do not have alternate text

Best Practices

canterburytravel.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

canterburytravel.com SEO score

99

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Canterburytravel.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Canterburytravel.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Canterburytravel. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: