Access cardiogram.com. Cardiogram

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.9 s

53/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value11.8 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value7.1 s

31/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value620 ms

48/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.032

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value12.7 s

14/100

10%

cardiogram.com

22 ms

cardiogram.com

334 ms

js

78 ms

ed02d3356320571cd071f8cc35d3c637.css

29 ms

css

107 ms

Our browser made a total of 66 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 68% of them (45 requests) were addressed to the original Cardiogram.com, 18% (12 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 6% (4 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (514 ms) belongs to the original domain Cardiogram.com.

Content Size

750.9 kB

After Optimization

640.7 kB

In fact, the total size of Cardiogram.com main page is 750.9 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 334.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 110.0 kB

Original 134.3 kB
After minification 134.3 kB
After compression 24.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 110.0 kB or 82% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

Original 334.9 kB
After minification 334.9 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Cardiogram images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 143 B

Original 195.2 kB
After minification 195.2 kB
After compression 195.1 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 19 B

Original 86.4 kB
After minification 86.4 kB
After compression 86.4 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Cardiogram.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Now

After Optimization

The browser has sent 51 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Cardiogram. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 25 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 11 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.