Report Summary

  • 28

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    47% of other websites

  • 84

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 56% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 91

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    70% of websites

carriall.com

The Carriall Co | Smart luggage and backpack | Luggage and backpacks

Page Load Speed

27 sec in total

First Response

737 ms

Resources Loaded

3.4 sec

Page Rendered

22.9 sec

About Website

Click here to check amazing Carriall content for India. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about carriall.com

A premium luggage brand, mainly focuses on innovation and design. Our luggage and backpacks are designed to meet the needs of modern travelers and lifestyle.

Visit carriall.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Carriall.com page load time and found that the first response time was 737 ms and then it took 26.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 95% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

carriall.com performance score

28

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.2 s

79/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value8.1 s

2/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value8.4 s

18/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value2,210 ms

6/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value16.9 s

5/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

carriall.com

737 ms

mii3jkszfs

70 ms

fbevents.js

43 ms

es-module-shims.min.js

64 ms

preloads.js

118 ms

Our browser made a total of 66 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 82% of them (54 requests) were addressed to the original Carriall.com, 5% (3 requests) were made to Cdn.jsdelivr.net and 3% (2 requests) were made to Clarity.ms. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.3 sec) belongs to the original domain Carriall.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 2.6 MB (7%)

Content Size

39.1 MB

After Optimization

36.6 MB

In fact, the total size of Carriall.com main page is 39.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 38.6 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-85%

Potential reduce by 284.1 kB

  • Original 332.3 kB
  • After minification 320.7 kB
  • After compression 48.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 284.1 kB or 85% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-6%

Potential reduce by 2.3 MB

  • Original 38.6 MB
  • After minification 36.4 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Carriall images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-18%

Potential reduce by 23.3 kB

  • Original 128.9 kB
  • After minification 128.9 kB
  • After compression 105.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 23.3 kB or 18% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 167 B

  • Original 24.6 kB
  • After minification 24.6 kB
  • After compression 24.4 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Carriall.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 18 (28%)

Requests Now

65

After Optimization

47

The browser has sent 65 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Carriall. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 19 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

carriall.com accessibility score

84

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

carriall.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

carriall.com SEO score

91

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Carriall.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Carriall.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Carriall. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: