Tools & Wizards About Us

Report Summary

  • 36

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    55% of other websites

  • 45

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 19% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 69

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    28% of websites

carryferry.com

澳门尼威斯人网站8311-(福州)有限公司

Page Load Speed

26.1 sec in total

First Response

1.8 sec

Resources Loaded

24.1 sec

Page Rendered

225 ms

About Website

Visit carryferry.com now to see the best up-to-date Carryferry content for India and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about carryferry.com

澳门尼威斯人网站8311澳门尼威斯人网站8311澳门尼威斯人网站8311澳门尼威斯人网站8311澳门尼威斯人网站8311澳门尼威斯人网站8311澳门尼威斯人网站8311澳门尼威斯人网站8311澳门尼威斯人网站8311澳门尼威斯人网站8311

Visit carryferry.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Carryferry.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1.8 sec and then it took 24.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 95% of websites can load faster. Unfortunately, there was 1 request timeout, which can generally increase the web page load time, as the browser stays idle while waiting for website response.

Performance Metrics

carryferry.com performance score

36

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.9 s

10/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value26.8 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value19.4 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value110 ms

98/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.527

14/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value8.4 s

39/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

carryferry.com

1755 ms

home.php

492 ms

home.php

250 ms

jquery.min.js

247 ms

index.php

1119 ms

Our browser made a total of 42 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 12% of them (5 requests) were addressed to the original Carryferry.com, 76% (32 requests) were made to Image110.com and 5% (2 requests) were made to Js.users.51.la. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (20.1 sec) relates to the external source Cdn.bootscdn.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 56.0 kB (16%)

Content Size

340.5 kB

After Optimization

284.5 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of Carryferry.com main page is 340.5 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 330.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-76%

Potential reduce by 4.9 kB

  • Original 6.4 kB
  • After minification 6.4 kB
  • After compression 1.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 4.9 kB or 76% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-15%

Potential reduce by 48.5 kB

  • Original 330.3 kB
  • After minification 281.7 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Carryferry needs image optimization as it can save up to 48.5 kB or 15% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-69%

Potential reduce by 2.6 kB

  • Original 3.8 kB
  • After minification 2.6 kB
  • After compression 1.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 2.6 kB or 69% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 3 (8%)

Requests Now

38

After Optimization

35

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript

The browser has sent 38 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Carryferry. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 4 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

Accessibility Review

carryferry.com accessibility score

45

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

carryferry.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

carryferry.com SEO score

69

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Page is blocked from indexing

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document doesn't use legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    ZH

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    N/A

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Carryferry.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Chinese is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Carryferry.com main page’s claimed encoding is . Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Carryferry. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: