Report Summary

  • 73

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    82% of other websites

  • 97

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 92% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 93

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    83% of websites

cartfolder.com

CartFolder - Reviews, Experiences & Shopping advice

Page Load Speed

34.8 sec in total

First Response

168 ms

Resources Loaded

4.8 sec

Page Rendered

29.8 sec

About Website

Welcome to cartfolder.com homepage info - get ready to check Cart Folder best content right away, or after learning these important things about cartfolder.com

Here at CartFolder, We review the product by doing a comparison of different products depending on different factors to help users while shopping.

Visit cartfolder.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Cartfolder.com page load time and found that the first response time was 168 ms and then it took 34.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 95% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

cartfolder.com performance score

73

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.3 s

41/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.4 s

68/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value3.7 s

86/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value370 ms

71/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.085

93/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value4.9 s

77/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

cartfolder.com

168 ms

cartfolder.com

459 ms

812a581e87ccf06c23f142430743a939.css

252 ms

js

62 ms

lazyload.min.js

74 ms

Our browser made a total of 224 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 98% of them (220 requests) were addressed to the original Cartfolder.com, 1% (2 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com and 1% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.5 sec) belongs to the original domain Cartfolder.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 1.2 MB (4%)

Content Size

32.6 MB

After Optimization

31.4 MB

In fact, the total size of Cartfolder.com main page is 32.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only a small number of websites need less resources to load. Images take 31.8 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-93%

Potential reduce by 714.1 kB

  • Original 766.2 kB
  • After minification 750.4 kB
  • After compression 52.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 714.1 kB or 93% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 485.7 kB

  • Original 31.8 MB
  • After minification 31.3 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Cart Folder images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-60%

Potential reduce by 32.0 kB

  • Original 52.9 kB
  • After minification 52.9 kB
  • After compression 20.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 32.0 kB or 60% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 4 (2%)

Requests Now

222

After Optimization

218

The browser has sent 222 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Cart Folder. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 5 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

cartfolder.com accessibility score

97

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

cartfolder.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

cartfolder.com SEO score

93

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Cartfolder.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Cartfolder.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Cart Folder. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: