Tools & Wizards About Us

Report Summary

  • 31

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    51% of other websites

  • 66

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 31% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 87

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    65% of websites

catalograck.com

CatalogRack by DCi - Search & Source Aftermarket Parts

Page Load Speed

3.1 sec in total

First Response

243 ms

Resources Loaded

2.4 sec

Page Rendered

495 ms

About Website

Visit catalograck.com now to see the best up-to-date Catalog Rack content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about catalograck.com

Direct Communications provides data services to the Automotive Aftermarket helping Manufacturers, Jobbers, Retailers & Distributors increase sales through All Channels of Distribution

Visit catalograck.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Catalograck.com page load time and found that the first response time was 243 ms and then it took 2.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

catalograck.com performance score

31

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value5.1 s

9/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value11.6 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value6.6 s

38/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value980 ms

28/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.003

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value10.0 s

26/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

catalograck.com

243 ms

www.catalograck.com

568 ms

public.css

179 ms

jquery-ui.css

175 ms

jquery-1.8.3.js

366 ms

Our browser made a total of 40 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 88% of them (35 requests) were addressed to the original Catalograck.com, 8% (3 requests) were made to Imagesrv.catalograck.com and 5% (2 requests) were made to Ssl.google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (568 ms) belongs to the original domain Catalograck.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 1.1 MB (66%)

Content Size

1.7 MB

After Optimization

570.4 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Catalograck.com main page is 1.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 1.0 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 868.1 kB

  • Original 1.0 MB
  • After minification 1.0 MB
  • After compression 167.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 868.1 kB or 84% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-27%

Potential reduce by 59.6 kB

  • Original 224.1 kB
  • After minification 164.5 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Catalog Rack needs image optimization as it can save up to 59.6 kB or 27% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-42%

Potential reduce by 161.6 kB

  • Original 385.3 kB
  • After minification 385.3 kB
  • After compression 223.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 161.6 kB or 42% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-48%

Potential reduce by 13.4 kB

  • Original 27.7 kB
  • After minification 27.7 kB
  • After compression 14.3 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Catalograck.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 13.4 kB or 48% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 27 (71%)

Requests Now

38

After Optimization

11

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 38 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Catalog Rack. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 15 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

Accessibility Review

catalograck.com accessibility score

66

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Best Practices

catalograck.com best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

High

Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools

SEO Factors

catalograck.com SEO score

87

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

robots.txt is not valid

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Catalograck.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Catalograck.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Catalog Rack. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: