Access catch-e.net. [キャッチー]：茨城県つくば市のホームページ制作会社

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value1.6 s

94/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value2.4 s

91/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value2.3 s

99/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value290 ms

80/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value4.8 s

79/100

10%

catch-e.net

902 ms

style.css

174 ms

logic.js

340 ms

js

70 ms

analytics.js

91 ms

Our browser made a total of 35 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 89% of them (31 requests) were addressed to the original Catch-e.net, 6% (2 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com and 6% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (902 ms) belongs to the original domain Catch-e.net.

Content Size

52.8 kB

After Optimization

45.2 kB

In fact, the total size of Catch-e.net main page is 52.8 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 15% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 21.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-69%

Potential reduce by 7.2 kB

Original 10.4 kB
After minification 9.1 kB
After compression 3.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 1.4 kB, which is 13% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 7.2 kB or 69% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

Original 19.5 kB
After minification 19.5 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Catch E images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 160 B

Original 21.8 kB
After minification 21.8 kB
After compression 21.6 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-22%

Potential reduce by 234 B

Original 1.1 kB
After minification 1.1 kB
After compression 850 B

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Catch-e.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 234 B or 22% of the original size.

Requests Now

After Optimization

The browser has sent 34 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Catch E. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 4 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.