Tools & Wizards About Us

Report Summary

  • 11

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    24% of other websites

  • 81

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 51% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 86

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    60% of websites

ceag.org

Consilience | Legal & Business Energy Trading Consultancy

Page Load Speed

14 sec in total

First Response

580 ms

Resources Loaded

12.9 sec

Page Rendered

592 ms

About Website

Welcome to ceag.org homepage info - get ready to check Ceag best content right away, or after learning these important things about ceag.org

Consilience provides strategic energy trading consultancy, expert witness services and specialist energy training to the global oil & gas industry.

Visit ceag.org

Key Findings

We analyzed Ceag.org page load time and found that the first response time was 580 ms and then it took 13.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 90% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

ceag.org performance score

11

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value17.9 s

0/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value35.9 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value46.5 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,540 ms

13/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.277

44/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value37.4 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

ceag.org

580 ms

frontend.css

213 ms

styles.css

213 ms

style.min.css

214 ms

wpmenucart-icons.min.css

216 ms

Our browser made a total of 180 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 87% of them (157 requests) were addressed to the original Ceag.org, 11% (19 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 1% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (9.2 sec) belongs to the original domain Ceag.org.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 156.1 kB (39%)

Content Size

405.2 kB

After Optimization

249.1 kB

  • HTML
  • Images

In fact, the total size of Ceag.org main page is 405.2 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 214.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 156.0 kB

  • Original 191.1 kB
  • After minification 184.8 kB
  • After compression 35.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 156.0 kB or 82% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 142 B

  • Original 214.1 kB
  • After minification 213.9 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Ceag images are well optimized though.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 145 (92%)

Requests Now

157

After Optimization

12

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 157 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Ceag. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 119 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 28 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

Accessibility Review

ceag.org accessibility score

81

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

ceag.org best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

ceag.org SEO score

86

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Ceag.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Ceag.org main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Ceag. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: