Report Summary

  • 25

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    44% of other websites

  • 93

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 80% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    94% of websites

ceeva.com

IT Services Provider and IT Support Company Pittsburgh, PA

Page Load Speed

2 sec in total

First Response

133 ms

Resources Loaded

1.3 sec

Page Rendered

580 ms

About Website

Welcome to ceeva.com homepage info - get ready to check Ceeva best content right away, or after learning these important things about ceeva.com

Ceeva has been a trusted IT Service Provider in Pittsburgh for over 30 years. Learn why our team offers IT Confidence as a Service and why 94% of our customers renew.

Visit ceeva.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Ceeva.com page load time and found that the first response time was 133 ms and then it took 1.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

ceeva.com performance score

25

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.0 s

24/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value9.1 s

1/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value5.1 s

61/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value2,960 ms

3/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.033

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value15.1 s

7/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.ceeva.com

133 ms

css2

73 ms

css2

92 ms

792128662c.js

86 ms

main.min.css

50 ms

Our browser made a total of 110 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 58% of them (64 requests) were addressed to the original Ceeva.com, 19% (21 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 4% (4 requests) were made to Use.fontawesome.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (633 ms) belongs to the original domain Ceeva.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 79.7 kB (1%)

Content Size

6.7 MB

After Optimization

6.6 MB

In fact, the total size of Ceeva.com main page is 6.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 6.5 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 68.8 kB

  • Original 84.0 kB
  • After minification 76.2 kB
  • After compression 15.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 68.8 kB or 82% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 297 B

  • Original 6.5 MB
  • After minification 6.5 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Ceeva images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-7%

Potential reduce by 7.3 kB

  • Original 107.7 kB
  • After minification 107.7 kB
  • After compression 100.4 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-11%

Potential reduce by 3.3 kB

  • Original 30.3 kB
  • After minification 30.3 kB
  • After compression 27.0 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Ceeva.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 3.3 kB or 11% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 50 (60%)

Requests Now

84

After Optimization

34

The browser has sent 84 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Ceeva. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 29 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 18 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

ceeva.com accessibility score

93

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

[id] attributes on active, focusable elements are not unique

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

ceeva.com best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

ceeva.com SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Ceeva.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Ceeva.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Ceeva. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: