Report Summary

  • 43

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    62% of other websites

  • 74

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 40% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 99

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    93% of websites

charlestonweddingguide.com

Official Site For Charleston Weddings | Charleston, SC Wedding Guide

Page Load Speed

2.2 sec in total

First Response

45 ms

Resources Loaded

695 ms

Page Rendered

1.5 sec

About Website

Click here to check amazing Charleston Wedding Guide content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about charlestonweddingguide.com

Say I do in one of the most celebrated destinations in the world. Charleston, SC has been named among America's Most Romantic Cities. Start Planning Today.

Visit charlestonweddingguide.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Charlestonweddingguide.com page load time and found that the first response time was 45 ms and then it took 2.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

charlestonweddingguide.com performance score

43

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.0 s

49/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value10.9 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.3 s

75/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value650 ms

46/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value10.7 s

22/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

charlestonweddingguide.com

45 ms

charlestonweddingguide.com

67 ms

www.charlestonweddingguide.com

114 ms

app.20240429071641.css

35 ms

hero-home_tiny.jpg

83 ms

Our browser made a total of 34 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 59% of them (20 requests) were addressed to the original Charlestonweddingguide.com, 9% (3 requests) were made to I0.wp.com and 6% (2 requests) were made to Admin.charlestoncvb.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (188 ms) relates to the external source Admin.charlestoncvb.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 734.6 kB (35%)

Content Size

2.1 MB

After Optimization

1.3 MB

In fact, the total size of Charlestonweddingguide.com main page is 2.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-94%

Potential reduce by 732.7 kB

  • Original 782.7 kB
  • After minification 761.0 kB
  • After compression 50.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 732.7 kB or 94% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 1.1 MB
  • After minification 1.1 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Charleston Wedding Guide images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 87 B

  • Original 217.1 kB
  • After minification 217.1 kB
  • After compression 217.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-9%

Potential reduce by 1.9 kB

  • Original 21.2 kB
  • After minification 21.2 kB
  • After compression 19.3 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Charlestonweddingguide.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 13 (50%)

Requests Now

26

After Optimization

13

The browser has sent 26 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Charleston Wedding Guide. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 14 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

charlestonweddingguide.com accessibility score

74

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

List items (<li>) are not contained within <ul> or <ol> parent elements.

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

charlestonweddingguide.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

charlestonweddingguide.com SEO score

99

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Charlestonweddingguide.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Charlestonweddingguide.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Charleston Wedding Guide. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: