Tools & Wizards About Us

Report Summary

  • 24

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    43% of other websites

  • 78

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 45% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 86

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    60% of websites

checkmark.com

CheckMark – Delivering Business Software Since 1984

Page Load Speed

2.7 sec in total

First Response

131 ms

Resources Loaded

2.2 sec

Page Rendered

374 ms

About Website

Welcome to checkmark.com homepage info - get ready to check Check Mark best content for India right away, or after learning these important things about checkmark.com

Reliable business software for streamlining your payroll, accounting and tax reporting processes for your small business. Get your FREE TRIAL today.

Visit checkmark.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Checkmark.com page load time and found that the first response time was 131 ms and then it took 2.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

checkmark.com performance score

24

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value5.0 s

9/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value7.6 s

3/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value7.4 s

27/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,190 ms

21/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.129

82/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value14.4 s

9/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

checkmark.com

131 ms

www.checkmark.com

645 ms

css

113 ms

usweb.css

264 ms

usresponsive.css

293 ms

Our browser made a total of 91 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 90% of them (82 requests) were addressed to the original Checkmark.com, 2% (2 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com and 2% (2 requests) were made to Clarity.ms. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (645 ms) belongs to the original domain Checkmark.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 363.3 kB (43%)

Content Size

844.2 kB

After Optimization

480.9 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Checkmark.com main page is 844.2 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 399.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 67.1 kB

  • Original 81.2 kB
  • After minification 59.8 kB
  • After compression 14.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 21.4 kB, which is 26% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 67.1 kB or 83% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-32%

Potential reduce by 127.4 kB

  • Original 399.2 kB
  • After minification 271.8 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Check Mark needs image optimization as it can save up to 127.4 kB or 32% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-47%

Potential reduce by 122.2 kB

  • Original 260.4 kB
  • After minification 260.4 kB
  • After compression 138.1 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 122.2 kB or 47% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-45%

Potential reduce by 46.6 kB

  • Original 103.4 kB
  • After minification 103.4 kB
  • After compression 56.8 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Checkmark.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 46.6 kB or 45% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 41 (49%)

Requests Now

84

After Optimization

43

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 84 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Check Mark. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 17 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

Accessibility Review

checkmark.com accessibility score

78

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

ARIA input fields do not have accessible names

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).

Best Practices

checkmark.com best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

checkmark.com SEO score

86

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Checkmark.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Checkmark.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Check Mark. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: