Access chirpee.net. Chirpee Flowers | Wedding Flowers in Sussex Chelsea Gold Medal Winner Unit 2 Station Business Park K...

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.8 s

28/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value19.7 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value7.4 s

28/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value590 ms

50/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value15.9 s

6/100

10%

www.chirpee.net

95 ms

minified.js

42 ms

focus-within-polyfill.js

42 ms

polyfill.min.js

1426 ms

mobile-app-invite-banner.css

71 ms

Our browser made a total of 85 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Chirpee.net, 62% (53 requests) were made to Static.wixstatic.com and 19% (16 requests) were made to Static.parastorage.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.7 sec) relates to the external source Static.wixstatic.com.

Content Size

2.5 MB

After Optimization

1.7 MB

In fact, the total size of Chirpee.net main page is 2.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.2 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-79%

Potential reduce by 584.3 kB

Original 743.2 kB
After minification 741.3 kB
After compression 158.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 584.3 kB or 79% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 13.2 kB

Original 1.2 MB
After minification 1.2 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Chirpee images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-44%

Potential reduce by 228.8 kB

Original 525.3 kB
After minification 525.3 kB
After compression 296.5 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 228.8 kB or 44% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-4%

Potential reduce by 56 B

Original 1.4 kB
After minification 1.4 kB
After compression 1.3 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Chirpee.net has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Now

After Optimization

The browser has sent 82 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Chirpee. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 12 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.