Report Summary

  • 76

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    84% of other websites

  • 86

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 61% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 92

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    74% of websites

Page Load Speed

605 ms in total

First Response

235 ms

Resources Loaded

317 ms

Page Rendered

53 ms

About Website

Click here to check amazing Chivespool content for Russia. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about chivespool.com

Visit chivespool.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Chivespool.com page load time and found that the first response time was 235 ms and then it took 370 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is an excellent result, as only 5% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

chivespool.com performance score

76

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.9 s

25/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.1 s

47/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value3.9 s

82/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value0 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.033

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value4.1 s

87/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

chivespool.com

235 ms

ww25.chivespool.com

79 ms

bNICsOtee.js

3 ms

Our browser made a total of 3 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 33% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Chivespool.com, 67% (2 requests) were made to Ww25.chivespool.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (235 ms) belongs to the original domain Chivespool.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 685 B (0%)

Content Size

278.8 kB

After Optimization

278.1 kB

In fact, the total size of Chivespool.com main page is 278.8 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only 5% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 192.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-31%

Potential reduce by 362 B

  • Original 1.2 kB
  • After minification 1.2 kB
  • After compression 817 B

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 362 B or 31% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 323 B

  • Original 192.4 kB
  • After minification 192.1 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Chivespool images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 85.2 kB
  • After minification 85.2 kB
  • After compression 85.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

1

After Optimization

1

The browser has sent 1 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Chivespool. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Accessibility Review

chivespool.com accessibility score

86

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

Best Practices

chivespool.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

SEO Factors

chivespool.com SEO score

92

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Page is blocked from indexing

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Chivespool.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Chivespool.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Chivespool. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: