Tools & Wizards About Us

Report Summary

  • 29

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    49% of other websites

  • 76

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 42% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 75

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    32% of websites

choicepoint.net

LexisNexis Risk Solutions | Transform Your Risk Decision Making

Page Load Speed

979 ms in total

First Response

189 ms

Resources Loaded

658 ms

Page Rendered

132 ms

About Website

Visit choicepoint.net now to see the best up-to-date Choicepoint content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about choicepoint.net

LexisNexis Risk Solutions uses Big Data, proprietary linking and targeted solutions to provide insights that help make organizations more secure and efficient.

Visit choicepoint.net

Key Findings

We analyzed Choicepoint.net page load time and found that the first response time was 189 ms and then it took 790 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 15% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

choicepoint.net performance score

29

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.5 s

14/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value11.7 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value12.1 s

3/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value770 ms

38/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value15.9 s

6/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

risk.lexisnexis.com

189 ms

main.css

23 ms

VisitorIdentification.js

111 ms

LNRS.bundle.config.js

102 ms

require.score.3.1.14.min.js

103 ms

Our browser made a total of 43 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 0% of them (0 request) were addressed to the original Choicepoint.net, 2% (1 request) were made to Cdnjs.cloudflare.com and 2% (1 request) were made to Img.en25.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (189 ms) relates to the external source Risk.lexisnexis.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 2.1 MB (29%)

Content Size

7.1 MB

After Optimization

5.1 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of Choicepoint.net main page is 7.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 4.8 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-89%

Potential reduce by 199.8 kB

  • Original 224.1 kB
  • After minification 204.0 kB
  • After compression 24.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 199.8 kB or 89% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-6%

Potential reduce by 266.1 kB

  • Original 4.8 MB
  • After minification 4.6 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Choicepoint images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-77%

Potential reduce by 1.6 MB

  • Original 2.1 MB
  • After minification 2.1 MB
  • After compression 480.8 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 1.6 MB or 77% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 4 (10%)

Requests Now

42

After Optimization

38

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 42 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Choicepoint. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 5 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

Accessibility Review

choicepoint.net accessibility score

76

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

List items (<li>) are not contained within <ul> or <ol> parent elements.

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

choicepoint.net best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

choicepoint.net SEO score

75

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Choicepoint.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Choicepoint.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Choicepoint. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: