Access chrisgrundemann.com. Creative Technologist and Business Consultant ~ Chris Grundemann

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value5.8 s

4/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value11.0 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value8.0 s

21/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value580 ms

51/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.252

49/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value9.6 s

29/100

10%

chrisgrundemann.com

49 ms

chrisgrundemann.com

148 ms

gWh1o1FqkLoQbUm9NIZeIalWbYo.js

26 ms

rocket-loader.min.js

15 ms

analytics.js

86 ms

Our browser made a total of 112 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 96% of them (108 requests) were addressed to the original Chrisgrundemann.com, 2% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 1% (1 request) were made to Static.cloudflareinsights.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.6 sec) belongs to the original domain Chrisgrundemann.com.

Content Size

1.6 MB

After Optimization

636.3 kB

In fact, the total size of Chrisgrundemann.com main page is 1.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 1.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-86%

Potential reduce by 975.9 kB

Original 1.1 MB
After minification 1.1 MB
After compression 161.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 975.9 kB or 86% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 30 B

Original 348.6 kB
After minification 348.5 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Chris Grundemann images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 605 B

Original 56.0 kB
After minification 56.0 kB
After compression 55.4 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-4%

Potential reduce by 3.1 kB

Original 74.0 kB
After minification 73.9 kB
After compression 70.8 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Chrisgrundemann.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Now

107

After Optimization

The browser has sent 107 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Chris Grundemann. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 6 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 77 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.