Access christiandan.com. Christian Dan

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value1.6 s

94/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value5.8 s

15/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value5.3 s

57/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value120 ms

97/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.021

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value4.7 s

81/100

10%

christiandan.com

288 ms

style.css

204 ms

prettyPhoto.css

283 ms

css

25 ms

jquery.prettyPhoto.js

286 ms

Our browser made a total of 26 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 81% of them (21 requests) were addressed to the original Christiandan.com, 8% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 4% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1 sec) belongs to the original domain Christiandan.com.

Content Size

1.9 MB

After Optimization

1.6 MB

In fact, the total size of Christiandan.com main page is 1.9 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.6 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-73%

Potential reduce by 6.4 kB

Original 8.8 kB
After minification 7.6 kB
After compression 2.4 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 1.2 kB, which is 13% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 6.4 kB or 73% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-7%

Potential reduce by 116.1 kB

Original 1.6 MB
After minification 1.5 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Christian Dan images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-64%

Potential reduce by 116.3 kB

Original 183.0 kB
After minification 180.8 kB
After compression 66.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 116.3 kB or 64% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-85%

Potential reduce by 46.7 kB

Original 54.8 kB
After minification 49.9 kB
After compression 8.1 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Christiandan.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 46.7 kB or 85% of the original size.

Requests Now

After Optimization

The browser has sent 23 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Christian Dan. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 4 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.