Tools & Wizards About Us

Report Summary

  • 22

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    40% of other websites

  • 84

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 56% of websites

  • 58

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    20% of websites

  • 71

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    30% of websites

ciap.net

CIAP : find simultaneous interpreters in Asia & Australia

Page Load Speed

9.2 sec in total

First Response

2.9 sec

Resources Loaded

6.2 sec

Page Rendered

81 ms

About Website

Welcome to ciap.net homepage info - get ready to check CIAP best content right away, or after learning these important things about ciap.net

CIAP helps you locate professional simultaneous interpreters across the Asia Pacific region. We work only with experienced, simultaneous interpreters.

Visit ciap.net

Key Findings

We analyzed Ciap.net page load time and found that the first response time was 2.9 sec and then it took 6.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

ciap.net performance score

22

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value10.5 s

0/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value16.0 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value24.8 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value680 ms

44/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.231

54/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value20.7 s

2/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

ciap.net

2935 ms

base.css

309 ms

error.css

1844 ms

base.css

246 ms

error.css

247 ms

Our browser made a total of 7 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that all of those requests were addressed to Ciap.net and no external sources were called. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.9 sec) belongs to the original domain Ciap.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 5.9 kB (5%)

Content Size

113.2 kB

After Optimization

107.4 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Ciap.net main page is 113.2 kB. This result falls within a vast category (top 1 000 000) of heavyweight, probably not optimized, and thus slow loading web pages. Only 5% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 104.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-55%

Potential reduce by 793 B

  • Original 1.4 kB
  • After minification 1.4 kB
  • After compression 648 B

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 793 B or 55% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 104.9 kB
  • After minification 104.9 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. CIAP images are well optimized though.

CSS Optimization

-74%

Potential reduce by 5.1 kB

  • Original 6.9 kB
  • After minification 3.7 kB
  • After compression 1.8 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Ciap.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 5.1 kB or 74% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 3 (50%)

Requests Now

6

After Optimization

3

  • Images
  • CSS

The browser has sent 6 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of CIAP. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

Accessibility Review

ciap.net accessibility score

84

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

ciap.net best practices score

58

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

ciap.net SEO score

71

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Ciap.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Ciap.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of CIAP. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: