Tools & Wizards About Us

Report Summary

  • 64

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    77% of other websites

  • 90

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 74% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 90

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    68% of websites

cibleclick.com

Cible Click |

Page Load Speed

3 sec in total

First Response

304 ms

Resources Loaded

2.3 sec

Page Rendered

432 ms

About Website

Visit cibleclick.com now to see the best up-to-date Cible Click content for France and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about cibleclick.com

| Cible Click

Visit cibleclick.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Cibleclick.com page load time and found that the first response time was 304 ms and then it took 2.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

cibleclick.com performance score

64

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.7 s

61/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value5.3 s

22/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value3.4 s

89/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value260 ms

84/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.035

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value9.8 s

28/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

cibleclick.com

304 ms

cibleclick.com

983 ms

css

34 ms

a8babcc0.css

283 ms

Cible.Click_-1.webp

279 ms

Our browser made a total of 53 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 53% of them (28 requests) were addressed to the original Cibleclick.com, 38% (20 requests) were made to and 4% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (983 ms) belongs to the original domain Cibleclick.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 173.8 kB (25%)

Content Size

706.2 kB

After Optimization

532.4 kB

  • HTML
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Cibleclick.com main page is 706.2 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 489.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-74%

Potential reduce by 97.5 kB

  • Original 130.9 kB
  • After minification 129.1 kB
  • After compression 33.4 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 97.5 kB or 74% of the original size.

JavaScript Optimization

-15%

Potential reduce by 75.6 kB

  • Original 489.4 kB
  • After minification 489.4 kB
  • After compression 413.8 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 75.6 kB or 15% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 746 B

  • Original 85.9 kB
  • After minification 85.9 kB
  • After compression 85.1 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Cibleclick.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 15 (79%)

Requests Now

19

After Optimization

4

  • AJAX
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 19 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Cible Click. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 13 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

Accessibility Review

cibleclick.com accessibility score

90

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

cibleclick.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

cibleclick.com SEO score

90

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    FR

  • Language Claimed

    FR

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Cibleclick.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that French is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Cibleclick.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of PARSED_DOMAIN, but there is no image specified in description. It would be a good idea for the website admin to select a nice image that can properly represent the website in Open Graph data, otherwise the first found image will be taken for this purpose and social media information block will look like this: