Report Summary

  • 5

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    21% of other websites

  • 80

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 49% of websites

  • 0

    Best Practices

  • 98

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    92% of websites

circleyard.com

CircleYard A Digital Pinboard For Employees Engagement

Page Load Speed

2.8 sec in total

First Response

763 ms

Resources Loaded

1.8 sec

Page Rendered

188 ms

About Website

Welcome to circleyard.com homepage info - get ready to check Circle Yard best content for India right away, or after learning these important things about circleyard.com

A modern day Digital Pinboard to engage your employees. Create an engaging communication environment through a variety of posts such as photos, events, announcements, seek opinions, and much more. Now...

Visit circleyard.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Circleyard.com page load time and found that the first response time was 763 ms and then it took 2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

circleyard.com performance score

5

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value18.8 s

0/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value24.1 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value21.2 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,610 ms

12/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.71

7/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value42.5 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

circleyard.com

763 ms

style.min.css

157 ms

layerslider.css

103 ms

css

21 ms

styles.css

79 ms

Our browser made a total of 77 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 75% of them (58 requests) were addressed to the original Circleyard.com, 16% (12 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 4% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (763 ms) belongs to the original domain Circleyard.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 3.9 MB (47%)

Content Size

8.3 MB

After Optimization

4.4 MB

In fact, the total size of Circleyard.com main page is 8.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 4.0 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-73%

Potential reduce by 87.9 kB

  • Original 120.0 kB
  • After minification 118.3 kB
  • After compression 32.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 87.9 kB or 73% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-13%

Potential reduce by 538.1 kB

  • Original 4.0 MB
  • After minification 3.5 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Circle Yard needs image optimization as it can save up to 538.1 kB or 13% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-61%

Potential reduce by 912.0 kB

  • Original 1.5 MB
  • After minification 1.4 MB
  • After compression 579.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 912.0 kB or 61% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-89%

Potential reduce by 2.4 MB

  • Original 2.7 MB
  • After minification 2.5 MB
  • After compression 282.8 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Circleyard.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 2.4 MB or 89% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 52 (87%)

Requests Now

60

After Optimization

8

The browser has sent 60 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Circle Yard. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 30 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 24 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

circleyard.com accessibility score

80

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Elements with an ARIA [role] that require children to contain a specific [role] are missing some or all of those required children.

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

List items (<li>) are not contained within <ul> or <ol> parent elements.

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

SEO Factors

circleyard.com SEO score

98

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Circleyard.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Circleyard.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Circle Yard. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: