Tools & Wizards About Us

Report Summary

  • 32

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    52% of other websites

  • 97

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 92% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 93

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    83% of websites

citrusleaf.com

Aerospike | Aerospike

Page Load Speed

2.5 sec in total

First Response

34 ms

Resources Loaded

2.1 sec

Page Rendered

300 ms

About Website

Welcome to citrusleaf.com homepage info - get ready to check Citrusleaf best content right away, or after learning these important things about citrusleaf.com

Aerospike provides organizations with a real-time, multi-model database that fits their needs to scale, manage cloud services, and reduce cost.

Visit citrusleaf.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Citrusleaf.com page load time and found that the first response time was 34 ms and then it took 2.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

citrusleaf.com performance score

32

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.2 s

44/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.7 s

58/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value7.6 s

26/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value4,330 ms

1/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.2

62/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value14.1 s

9/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

citrusleaf.com

34 ms

www.aerospike.com

21 ms

aerospike.com

66 ms

_post_-eCo661xy.css

108 ms

_slug_-DkDc1OXK.css

1478 ms

Our browser made a total of 23 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 4% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Citrusleaf.com, 83% (19 requests) were made to Aerospike.com and 13% (3 requests) were made to Images.ctfassets.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.5 sec) relates to the external source Aerospike.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 568.1 kB (66%)

Content Size

860.4 kB

After Optimization

292.4 kB

  • HTML
  • Images

In fact, the total size of Citrusleaf.com main page is 860.4 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 20% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 612.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-93%

Potential reduce by 568.1 kB

  • Original 612.6 kB
  • After minification 612.3 kB
  • After compression 44.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 568.1 kB or 93% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 247.8 kB
  • After minification 247.8 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Citrusleaf images are well optimized though.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 5 (50%)

Requests Now

10

After Optimization

5

  • Images
  • CSS

The browser has sent 10 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Citrusleaf. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

Accessibility Review

citrusleaf.com accessibility score

97

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best Practices

citrusleaf.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

citrusleaf.com SEO score

93

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Citrusleaf.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Citrusleaf.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Citrusleaf. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: