Report Summary

  • 32

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    52% of other websites

  • 92

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 79% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 99

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    93% of websites

clayburn.wtf

Clayburn's Blog | You haven't lived until you've read me

Page Load Speed

5.1 sec in total

First Response

970 ms

Resources Loaded

4 sec

Page Rendered

195 ms

About Website

Welcome to clayburn.wtf homepage info - get ready to check Clayburn best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about clayburn.wtf

This is the official web log of Clayburn Griffin. Come enjoy his ramblings and thoughts Internet form.

Visit clayburn.wtf

Key Findings

We analyzed Clayburn.wtf page load time and found that the first response time was 970 ms and then it took 4.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

clayburn.wtf performance score

32

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.6 s

33/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.7 s

59/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value9.1 s

14/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value2,090 ms

7/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.196

63/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value16.8 s

5/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.clayburn.wtf

970 ms

style.min.css

147 ms

form-basic.css

127 ms

style.css

136 ms

jquery.min.js

204 ms

Our browser made a total of 68 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 31% of them (21 requests) were addressed to the original Clayburn.wtf, 13% (9 requests) were made to Apis.google.com and 13% (9 requests) were made to Platform.twitter.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (971 ms) relates to the external source Developers.google.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 180.7 kB (23%)

Content Size

771.6 kB

After Optimization

591.0 kB

In fact, the total size of Clayburn.wtf main page is 771.6 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 494.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-75%

Potential reduce by 56.5 kB

  • Original 75.0 kB
  • After minification 72.9 kB
  • After compression 18.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 56.5 kB or 75% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-38%

Potential reduce by 58.2 kB

  • Original 152.1 kB
  • After minification 93.9 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Clayburn needs image optimization as it can save up to 58.2 kB or 38% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-9%

Potential reduce by 46.1 kB

  • Original 494.7 kB
  • After minification 494.7 kB
  • After compression 448.6 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-40%

Potential reduce by 19.9 kB

  • Original 49.8 kB
  • After minification 49.8 kB
  • After compression 29.9 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Clayburn.wtf needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 19.9 kB or 40% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 40 (65%)

Requests Now

62

After Optimization

22

The browser has sent 62 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Clayburn. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 29 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

clayburn.wtf accessibility score

92

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

clayburn.wtf best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

clayburn.wtf SEO score

99

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Clayburn.wtf can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Clayburn.wtf main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Clayburn. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: