Report Summary

  • 24

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    43% of other websites

  • 92

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 78% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 92

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    74% of websites

cobridge.com

医療機器の認証・承認取得をプロフェッショナルがサポート | 株式会社コーブリッジ

Page Load Speed

5.1 sec in total

First Response

574 ms

Resources Loaded

4 sec

Page Rendered

584 ms

About Website

Visit cobridge.com now to see the best up-to-date Cobridge content for Japan and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about cobridge.com

薬事申請サービスをはじめ、臨床試験、選任製造販売業者(DMAH)、MF登録申請・国内管理人業務など、幅広いサービスを通じて 医療機器の国内外市場への導入及び導出をサポートしています。

Visit cobridge.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Cobridge.com page load time and found that the first response time was 574 ms and then it took 4.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

cobridge.com performance score

24

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value5.0 s

10/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value9.0 s

1/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value9.1 s

14/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,370 ms

16/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.006

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value11.8 s

17/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

cobridge.com

574 ms

www.cobridge.com

1282 ms

style.css

352 ms

q-a-plus.css

516 ms

jquery.js

866 ms

Our browser made a total of 85 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 49% of them (42 requests) were addressed to the original Cobridge.com, 21% (18 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 8% (7 requests) were made to Cdnjs.cloudflare.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.3 sec) belongs to the original domain Cobridge.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 198.5 kB (20%)

Content Size

975.9 kB

After Optimization

777.4 kB

In fact, the total size of Cobridge.com main page is 975.9 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 594.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-79%

Potential reduce by 37.2 kB

  • Original 47.3 kB
  • After minification 41.7 kB
  • After compression 10.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 5.7 kB, which is 12% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 37.2 kB or 79% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 12.1 kB

  • Original 594.1 kB
  • After minification 582.0 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Cobridge images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-35%

Potential reduce by 95.0 kB

  • Original 270.5 kB
  • After minification 265.8 kB
  • After compression 175.5 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 95.0 kB or 35% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-85%

Potential reduce by 54.2 kB

  • Original 64.0 kB
  • After minification 55.2 kB
  • After compression 9.8 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Cobridge.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 54.2 kB or 85% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 34 (53%)

Requests Now

64

After Optimization

30

The browser has sent 64 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Cobridge. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 16 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 13 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

cobridge.com accessibility score

92

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

cobridge.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

cobridge.com SEO score

92

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    JA

  • Language Claimed

    JA

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Cobridge.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Japanese is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Cobridge.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Cobridge. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: