Report Summary

  • 18

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    34% of other websites

  • 97

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 92% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 93

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    83% of websites

cockerstowing.com

Towing Company in Elizabethtown, PA | Cocker's Towing, Inc

Page Load Speed

1.5 sec in total

First Response

31 ms

Resources Loaded

843 ms

Page Rendered

666 ms

About Website

Welcome to cockerstowing.com homepage info - get ready to check Cocker S Towing best content right away, or after learning these important things about cockerstowing.com

Are you looking for a reliable towing company in Elizabethtown, PA? Get in touch with the experts at Cocker's Towing, Inc for roadside assistance with vehicles and large equipment. Call us today ...

Visit cockerstowing.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Cockerstowing.com page load time and found that the first response time was 31 ms and then it took 1.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 30% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

cockerstowing.com performance score

18

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value6.0 s

4/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value8.6 s

1/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value9.5 s

12/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value3,500 ms

1/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.095

91/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value10.6 s

23/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

cockerstowing.com

31 ms

cockerstowing.com

89 ms

css

216 ms

a66900a7bf052b5b5952806103c43aa1.css

71 ms

jquery.min.js

505 ms

Our browser made a total of 15 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 27% of them (4 requests) were addressed to the original Cockerstowing.com, 27% (4 requests) were made to Secureservercdn.net and 27% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (570 ms) relates to the external source Nebula.wsimg.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 69.9 kB (13%)

Content Size

540.8 kB

After Optimization

470.9 kB

In fact, the total size of Cockerstowing.com main page is 540.8 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 428.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 68.6 kB

  • Original 81.4 kB
  • After minification 79.9 kB
  • After compression 12.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 68.6 kB or 84% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 1.2 kB

  • Original 428.5 kB
  • After minification 427.3 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Cocker S Towing images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 30.9 kB
  • After minification 30.9 kB
  • After compression 30.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

6

After Optimization

6

The browser has sent 6 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Cocker S Towing. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Accessibility Review

cockerstowing.com accessibility score

97

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

cockerstowing.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

cockerstowing.com SEO score

93

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Cockerstowing.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Cockerstowing.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Cocker S Towing. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: