Access codeexampler.com.

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.9 s

10/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value12.9 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value7.6 s

25/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value940 ms

30/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.006

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value10.6 s

23/100

10%

codeexampler.com

449 ms

adsbygoogle.js

376 ms

js

65 ms

main.6dae37df.js

460 ms

main.dcb721f3.css

863 ms

Our browser made a total of 8 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 38% of them (3 requests) were addressed to the original Codeexampler.com, 25% (2 requests) were made to Pagead2.googlesyndication.com and 25% (2 requests) were made to Googleads.g.doubleclick.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (863 ms) belongs to the original domain Codeexampler.com.

Content Size

873.9 kB

After Optimization

529.0 kB

In fact, the total size of Codeexampler.com main page is 873.9 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. CSS take 396.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-59%

Potential reduce by 4.2 kB

Original 7.1 kB
After minification 7.1 kB
After compression 2.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 4.2 kB or 59% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

Original 332.2 kB
After minification 332.2 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Codeexampler images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-18%

Potential reduce by 24.8 kB

Original 138.6 kB
After minification 138.6 kB
After compression 113.8 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 24.8 kB or 18% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-80%

Potential reduce by 315.9 kB

Original 396.0 kB
After minification 395.9 kB
After compression 80.1 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Codeexampler.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 315.9 kB or 80% of the original size.

Requests Now

After Optimization

The browser has sent 7 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Codeexampler. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 4 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.