Tools & Wizards About Us

Report Summary

  • 94

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    93% of other websites

  • 93

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 80% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    94% of websites

codexking.com

codexking

Page Load Speed

993 ms in total

First Response

229 ms

Resources Loaded

701 ms

Page Rendered

63 ms

About Website

Click here to check amazing Codexking content for India. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about codexking.com

Learn how to create dynamic forms in Angular, a powerful JavaScript framework for building interactive web applications. Discover the benefits of using dynamic forms, such as flexibility, real-time va...

Visit codexking.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Codexking.com page load time and found that the first response time was 229 ms and then it took 764 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 15% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

codexking.com performance score

94

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.4 s

69/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value2.4 s

91/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value2.4 s

98/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value0 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.009

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value2.4 s

98/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

codexking.com

229 ms

codexking.com

370 ms

css2

32 ms

css2

47 ms

font

37 ms

Our browser made a total of 5 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 40% of them (2 requests) were addressed to the original Codexking.com, 40% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com and 20% (1 request) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (370 ms) belongs to the original domain Codexking.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 10.3 kB (32%)

Content Size

32.7 kB

After Optimization

22.4 kB

  • HTML
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Codexking.com main page is 32.7 kB. This result falls within a vast category (top 1 000 000) of heavyweight, probably not optimized, and thus slow loading web pages. Only a small number of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 15.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-65%

Potential reduce by 10.3 kB

  • Original 15.8 kB
  • After minification 14.9 kB
  • After compression 5.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 10.3 kB or 65% of the original size.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 24 B

  • Original 13.1 kB
  • After minification 13.1 kB
  • After compression 13.1 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 17 B

  • Original 3.8 kB
  • After minification 3.8 kB
  • After compression 3.8 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Codexking.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

2

After Optimization

2

  • CSS

The browser has sent 2 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Codexking. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Network Requests Diagram

Accessibility Review

codexking.com accessibility score

93

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

codexking.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

SEO Factors

codexking.com SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Codexking.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Codexking.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Codexking. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: