Report Summary

  • 15

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    27% of other websites

  • 83

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 54% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 70

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    30% of websites

codiscope.com

Application Security Training | Synopsys

Page Load Speed

4.1 sec in total

First Response

354 ms

Resources Loaded

2.4 sec

Page Rendered

1.3 sec

About Website

Click here to check amazing Codiscope content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about codiscope.com

Visit codiscope.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Codiscope.com page load time and found that the first response time was 354 ms and then it took 3.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

codiscope.com performance score

15

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value6.1 s

3/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value11.2 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value22.3 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value66,640 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value87.5 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

training.html

354 ms

otSDKStub.js

175 ms

geo_v3.js

72 ms

CoveoFullSearch.min.css

172 ms

launch-44cc9b8559b8.min.js

657 ms

Our browser made a total of 56 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 0% of them (0 request) were addressed to the original Codiscope.com, 13% (7 requests) were made to Cdn.cookielaw.org and 7% (4 requests) were made to Images.synopsys.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (798 ms) relates to the external source Images.synopsys.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 219.9 kB (62%)

Content Size

356.9 kB

After Optimization

137.1 kB

In fact, the total size of Codiscope.com main page is 356.9 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. HTML takes 251.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 210.4 kB

  • Original 251.6 kB
  • After minification 225.0 kB
  • After compression 41.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 26.6 kB, which is 11% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 210.4 kB or 84% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 642 B

  • Original 29.1 kB
  • After minification 28.5 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Codiscope images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-33%

Potential reduce by 8.7 kB

  • Original 26.4 kB
  • After minification 26.4 kB
  • After compression 17.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 8.7 kB or 33% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 128 B

  • Original 49.8 kB
  • After minification 49.8 kB
  • After compression 49.7 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Codiscope.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 18 (39%)

Requests Now

46

After Optimization

28

The browser has sent 46 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Codiscope. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 16 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

codiscope.com accessibility score

83

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).

High

List items (<li>) are not contained within <ul> or <ol> parent elements.

Best Practices

codiscope.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

codiscope.com SEO score

70

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Codiscope.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Codiscope.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Codiscope. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: