Tools & Wizards About Us

Report Summary

  • 16

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    30% of other websites

  • 63

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 28% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 83

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    46% of websites

comforterlab.com

Best Down Comforter Reviews 2017 | Buying Guide - comforterlab

Page Load Speed

28 sec in total

First Response

3.1 sec

Resources Loaded

23.7 sec

Page Rendered

1.2 sec

About Website

Click here to check amazing Comforter Lab content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about comforterlab.com

Check out our website to reveal the best down comforter reviews.Our buying guide will help you choose the best comforter within minutes.

Visit comforterlab.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Comforterlab.com page load time and found that the first response time was 3.1 sec and then it took 24.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 95% of websites can load faster. Unfortunately, there were 9 request timeouts, which can generally increase the web page load time, as the browser stays idle while waiting for website response.

Performance Metrics

comforterlab.com performance score

16

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value14.4 s

0/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value19.0 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value19.8 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value2,580 ms

4/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value25.7 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.comforterlab.com

3054 ms

analytics.js

23 ms

dChlLmNvbmNhdGVtb2ppKTplLndwZW1vamkmJmUudHdlbW9qaSYmKHQoZS50d2Vtb2ppKSx0KGUud3BlbW9qaSkpKX0pKX0oKHdpbmRvdyxkb2N1bWVudCksd2luZG93Ll93cGVtb2ppU2V0dGluZ3MpOwo=

10 ms

style.min.css

504 ms

mediaelementplayer-legacy.min.css

507 ms

Our browser made a total of 135 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 56% of them (76 requests) were addressed to the original Comforterlab.com, 9% (12 requests) were made to and 7% (9 requests) were made to Ws-na.amazon-adsystem.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (20.1 sec) relates to the external source Ir-na.amazon-adsystem.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 135.8 kB (14%)

Content Size

988.1 kB

After Optimization

852.3 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Comforterlab.com main page is 988.1 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Javascripts take 430.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-80%

Potential reduce by 125.3 kB

  • Original 156.3 kB
  • After minification 156.1 kB
  • After compression 31.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 125.3 kB or 80% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-6%

Potential reduce by 6.6 kB

  • Original 106.7 kB
  • After minification 100.1 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Comforter Lab images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 3.4 kB

  • Original 430.4 kB
  • After minification 430.4 kB
  • After compression 427.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 624 B

  • Original 294.7 kB
  • After minification 294.4 kB
  • After compression 294.0 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Comforterlab.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 81 (81%)

Requests Now

100

After Optimization

19

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 100 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Comforter Lab. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 69 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 14 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

Accessibility Review

comforterlab.com accessibility score

63

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).

Best Practices

comforterlab.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

comforterlab.com SEO score

83

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Comforterlab.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Comforterlab.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Comforter Lab. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: