Tools & Wizards About Us

Report Summary

  • 79

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    85% of other websites

  • 96

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 88% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 89

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    66% of websites

comparebestwebhosting.com

Top 6 Best Budget Web Hosting Providers for 2023 - Compare Best Web Hosting

Page Load Speed

1.4 sec in total

First Response

446 ms

Resources Loaded

966 ms

Page Rendered

0 ms

About Website

Visit comparebestwebhosting.com now to see the best up-to-date Compare Best Web Hosting content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about comparebestwebhosting.com

Choosing the best web hosting is tough. There are hundreds of options, and every web hosting claims to be the best one out there. We’ve narrowed things down to the top 6 web hosting, and indicated whi...

Visit comparebestwebhosting.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Comparebestwebhosting.com page load time and found that the first response time was 446 ms and then it took 966 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 20% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

comparebestwebhosting.com performance score

79

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.1 s

46/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.1 s

48/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.4 s

74/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value0 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value3.1 s

95/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

comparebestwebhosting.com

446 ms

lazyload.min.js

82 ms

Our browser made a total of 2 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that all of those requests were addressed to Comparebestwebhosting.com and no external sources were called. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (446 ms) belongs to the original domain Comparebestwebhosting.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 217.1 kB (85%)

Content Size

256.4 kB

After Optimization

39.3 kB

  • HTML
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of Comparebestwebhosting.com main page is 256.4 kB. This result falls within a vast category (top 1 000 000) of heavyweight, probably not optimized, and thus slow loading web pages. Only a small number of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 253.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-86%

Potential reduce by 217.1 kB

  • Original 253.4 kB
  • After minification 245.0 kB
  • After compression 36.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 217.1 kB or 86% of the original size.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 2 B

  • Original 3.0 kB
  • After minification 3.0 kB
  • After compression 3.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

1

After Optimization

1

  • JavaScript

The browser has sent 1 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Compare Best Web Hosting. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Network Requests Diagram

Accessibility Review

comparebestwebhosting.com accessibility score

96

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

comparebestwebhosting.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

comparebestwebhosting.com SEO score

89

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Comparebestwebhosting.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Comparebestwebhosting.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of PARSED_DOMAIN, but there is no image specified in description. It would be a good idea for the website admin to select a nice image that can properly represent the website in Open Graph data, otherwise the first found image will be taken for this purpose and social media information block will look like this: