Tools & Wizards About Us

Report Summary

  • 60

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    75% of other websites

  • 79

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 47% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 86

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    60% of websites

comparebreakdowncover.co.uk

Compare Breakdown Cover | Great Savings on UK and European Breakdown Cover

Page Load Speed

2.8 sec in total

First Response

461 ms

Resources Loaded

2 sec

Page Rendered

383 ms

About Website

Welcome to comparebreakdowncover.co.uk homepage info - get ready to check Compare Breakdown Cover best content for United Kingdom right away, or after learning these important things about comparebreakdowncover.co.uk

Annual cover from just £20.83. Compare breakdown cover quotes from a panel of providers in seconds! Feefo Platinum Awarded 2022.

Visit comparebreakdowncover.co.uk

Key Findings

We analyzed Comparebreakdowncover.co.uk page load time and found that the first response time was 461 ms and then it took 2.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

comparebreakdowncover.co.uk performance score

60

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.6 s

63/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value2.8 s

82/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value3.9 s

82/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value940 ms

29/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.066

97/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value11.5 s

18/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

comparebreakdowncover.co.uk

461 ms

www.comparebreakdowncover.co.uk

431 ms

cbc-v2.57.css

316 ms

WebResource.axd

310 ms

ScriptResource.axd

358 ms

Our browser made a total of 39 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 92% of them (36 requests) were addressed to the original Comparebreakdowncover.co.uk, 3% (1 request) were made to Stats.comparebreakdowncover.co.uk and 3% (1 request) were made to . The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (815 ms) belongs to the original domain Comparebreakdowncover.co.uk.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 231.6 kB (33%)

Content Size

708.4 kB

After Optimization

476.8 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Comparebreakdowncover.co.uk main page is 708.4 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 312.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-77%

Potential reduce by 83.0 kB

  • Original 107.1 kB
  • After minification 94.2 kB
  • After compression 24.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 12.9 kB, which is 12% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 83.0 kB or 77% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-30%

Potential reduce by 93.5 kB

  • Original 312.9 kB
  • After minification 219.3 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Compare Breakdown Cover needs image optimization as it can save up to 93.5 kB or 30% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-15%

Potential reduce by 25.6 kB

  • Original 176.3 kB
  • After minification 176.3 kB
  • After compression 150.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 25.6 kB or 15% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-26%

Potential reduce by 29.5 kB

  • Original 112.1 kB
  • After minification 112.1 kB
  • After compression 82.6 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Comparebreakdowncover.co.uk needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 29.5 kB or 26% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 10 (29%)

Requests Now

35

After Optimization

25

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 35 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Compare Breakdown Cover. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 11 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

Accessibility Review

comparebreakdowncover.co.uk accessibility score

79

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

[id] attributes on active, focusable elements are not unique

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

comparebreakdowncover.co.uk best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

comparebreakdowncover.co.uk SEO score

86

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Comparebreakdowncover.co.uk can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Comparebreakdowncover.co.uk main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Compare Breakdown Cover. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: