Tools & Wizards About Us

Report Summary

  • 31

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    51% of other websites

  • 100

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 97% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 83

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    46% of websites

comparecover.com

Compare Cover | Travel & Pet Insurance Quote Comparison Site

Page Load Speed

1.6 sec in total

First Response

148 ms

Resources Loaded

1.3 sec

Page Rendered

125 ms

About Website

Click here to check amazing Compare Cover content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about comparecover.com

Protect your world for less with Compare Cover. Compare travel and pet insurance quotes from leading insurance providers to make an informed decision.

Visit comparecover.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Comparecover.com page load time and found that the first response time was 148 ms and then it took 1.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 30% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

comparecover.com performance score

31

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.3 s

39/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value11.6 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value6.1 s

45/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value450 ms

63/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.638

9/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value10.1 s

26/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

comparecover.com

148 ms

comparecover.com

358 ms

bootstrap.min.css

345 ms

style.css

279 ms

ega4xyk.css

93 ms

Our browser made a total of 37 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 51% of them (19 requests) were addressed to the original Comparecover.com, 32% (12 requests) were made to Use.typekit.net and 11% (4 requests) were made to Cdn.theidol.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (513 ms) belongs to the original domain Comparecover.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 19.8 kB (3%)

Content Size

631.6 kB

After Optimization

611.7 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Comparecover.com main page is 631.6 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 591.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-75%

Potential reduce by 17.1 kB

  • Original 22.7 kB
  • After minification 21.8 kB
  • After compression 5.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 17.1 kB or 75% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 118 B

  • Original 591.4 kB
  • After minification 591.3 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Compare Cover images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 46 B

  • Original 6.0 kB
  • After minification 6.0 kB
  • After compression 6.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-23%

Potential reduce by 2.6 kB

  • Original 11.4 kB
  • After minification 11.4 kB
  • After compression 8.8 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Comparecover.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 2.6 kB or 23% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 10 (42%)

Requests Now

24

After Optimization

14

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 24 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Compare Cover. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 5 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

Accessibility Review

comparecover.com accessibility score

100

Accessibility Issues

Best Practices

comparecover.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

High

Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools

SEO Factors

comparecover.com SEO score

83

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    N/A

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Comparecover.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Comparecover.com main page’s claimed encoding is . Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Compare Cover. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: