Access competitorpricemonitoring.com. Competitor Price Monitoring

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value7.3 s

1/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value8.5 s

2/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value14.3 s

1/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,090 ms

24/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.031

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value14.6 s

8/100

10%

competitorpricemonitoring.com

134 ms

www.competitorpricemonitoring.com

816 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

62 ms

webfonts.css

102 ms

bootstrap.min.css

136 ms

Our browser made a total of 71 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 89% of them (63 requests) were addressed to the original Competitorpricemonitoring.com, 6% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (816 ms) belongs to the original domain Competitorpricemonitoring.com.

Content Size

1.1 MB

After Optimization

604.5 kB

In fact, the total size of Competitorpricemonitoring.com main page is 1.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 556.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-80%

Potential reduce by 42.4 kB

Original 53.3 kB
After minification 50.4 kB
After compression 10.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 42.4 kB or 80% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 7.8 kB

Original 300.1 kB
After minification 292.3 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Competitor Price Monitoring images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-72%

Potential reduce by 399.4 kB

Original 556.4 kB
After minification 541.5 kB
After compression 157.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 399.4 kB or 72% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-24%

Potential reduce by 45.0 kB

Original 189.2 kB
After minification 189.0 kB
After compression 144.3 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Competitorpricemonitoring.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 45.0 kB or 24% of the original size.

Requests Now

After Optimization

The browser has sent 61 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Competitor Price Monitoring. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 25 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 27 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.