Access computergap.com. NameBright

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value5.0 s

10/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value6.1 s

12/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value6.2 s

43/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value600 ms

49/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.047

99/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value6.3 s

61/100

10%

computergap.com

432 ms

computergap.com

1306 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

190 ms

style.min.css

303 ms

blocks.style.build.css

419 ms

Our browser made a total of 30 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 70% of them (21 requests) were addressed to the original Computergap.com, 7% (2 requests) were made to S7.addthis.com and 7% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.5 sec) belongs to the original domain Computergap.com.

Content Size

244.3 kB

After Optimization

167.4 kB

In fact, the total size of Computergap.com main page is 244.3 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 110.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-78%

Potential reduce by 70.5 kB

Original 90.1 kB
After minification 87.8 kB
After compression 19.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 70.5 kB or 78% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

Original 14.9 kB
After minification 14.9 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Computergap images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 1.6 kB

Original 110.1 kB
After minification 110.1 kB
After compression 108.5 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-17%

Potential reduce by 4.8 kB

Original 29.2 kB
After minification 28.6 kB
After compression 24.3 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Computergap.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 4.8 kB or 17% of the original size.

Requests Now

After Optimization

The browser has sent 25 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Computergap. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 12 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 10 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.