Tools & Wizards About Us

Report Summary

  • 19

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    36% of other websites

  • 89

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 71% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 84

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    52% of websites

consumerchoicecenter.org

Consumer Choice Center – We Represent Consumers

Page Load Speed

3.1 sec in total

First Response

163 ms

Resources Loaded

2.1 sec

Page Rendered

811 ms

About Website

Click here to check amazing Consumer Choice Center content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about consumerchoicecenter.org

Visit consumerchoicecenter.org

Key Findings

We analyzed Consumerchoicecenter.org page load time and found that the first response time was 163 ms and then it took 2.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

consumerchoicecenter.org performance score

19

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value5.3 s

7/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value61.1 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value16.1 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,630 ms

12/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.078

95/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value57.8 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

consumerchoicecenter.org

163 ms

consumerchoicecenter.org

410 ms

script.js

46 ms

mediaelementplayer-legacy.min.css

82 ms

wp-mediaelement.min.css

33 ms

Our browser made a total of 136 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 74% of them (101 requests) were addressed to the original Consumerchoicecenter.org, 20% (27 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 1% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (952 ms) belongs to the original domain Consumerchoicecenter.org.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 3.7 MB (16%)

Content Size

23.2 MB

After Optimization

19.5 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Consumerchoicecenter.org main page is 23.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only a small number of websites need less resources to load. Images take 22.5 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-85%

Potential reduce by 194.5 kB

  • Original 228.7 kB
  • After minification 211.8 kB
  • After compression 34.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 194.5 kB or 85% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-16%

Potential reduce by 3.5 MB

  • Original 22.5 MB
  • After minification 19.0 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Consumer Choice Center needs image optimization as it can save up to 3.5 MB or 16% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 3.1 kB

  • Original 229.8 kB
  • After minification 229.8 kB
  • After compression 226.8 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-4%

Potential reduce by 7.3 kB

  • Original 189.7 kB
  • After minification 187.7 kB
  • After compression 182.4 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Consumerchoicecenter.org has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 61 (60%)

Requests Now

101

After Optimization

40

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 101 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Consumer Choice Center. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 32 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 25 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

Accessibility Review

consumerchoicecenter.org accessibility score

89

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

consumerchoicecenter.org best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

consumerchoicecenter.org SEO score

84

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Consumerchoicecenter.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Consumerchoicecenter.org main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Consumer Choice Center. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: