Tools & Wizards About Us

Report Summary

  • 36

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    55% of other websites

  • 95

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 86% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 93

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    83% of websites

contact.digital

Glasgow SEO Agency Services: Web Design, Market Intelligence

Page Load Speed

4.5 sec in total

First Response

180 ms

Resources Loaded

3.7 sec

Page Rendered

637 ms

About Website

Welcome to contact.digital homepage info - get ready to check Contact best content right away, or after learning these important things about contact.digital

We're a process driven digital marketing agency delivering SEO and website results for over 20 years. We research your market to ensure the best outcomes on your campaigns."

Visit contact.digital

Key Findings

We analyzed Contact.digital page load time and found that the first response time was 180 ms and then it took 4.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

contact.digital performance score

36

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.0 s

24/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value5.3 s

22/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value7.6 s

26/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,000 ms

27/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.018

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value11.3 s

19/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

contact.digital

180 ms

contact.digital

464 ms

5r54s.css

587 ms

5r4tr.css

400 ms

css

40 ms

Our browser made a total of 63 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 81% of them (51 requests) were addressed to the original Contact.digital, 14% (9 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Cdnjs.cloudflare.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.1 sec) belongs to the original domain Contact.digital.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 203.9 kB (16%)

Content Size

1.3 MB

After Optimization

1.1 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Contact.digital main page is 1.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 826.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-86%

Potential reduce by 187.0 kB

  • Original 218.3 kB
  • After minification 214.7 kB
  • After compression 31.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 187.0 kB or 86% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 16.8 kB

  • Original 826.0 kB
  • After minification 809.2 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Contact images are well optimized though.

CSS Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 75 B

  • Original 265.5 kB
  • After minification 265.5 kB
  • After compression 265.4 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Contact.digital has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 14 (31%)

Requests Now

45

After Optimization

31

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 45 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Contact. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 7 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

Accessibility Review

contact.digital accessibility score

95

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

contact.digital best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

contact.digital SEO score

93

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Contact.digital can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Contact.digital main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Contact. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: