Access contactinstruments.com. Contact Instruments

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value10.7 s

0/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value20.6 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value21.9 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value8,440 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.079

94/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value36.5 s

0/100

10%

contactinstruments.com

1671 ms

ywraq-gutenberg.css

49 ms

woocommerce-layout.css

61 ms

woocommerce.css

75 ms

theme.min.css

49 ms

Our browser made a total of 152 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 82% of them (125 requests) were addressed to the original Contactinstruments.com, 12% (18 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 1% (2 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.7 sec) belongs to the original domain Contactinstruments.com.

Content Size

4.4 MB

After Optimization

2.1 MB

In fact, the total size of Contactinstruments.com main page is 4.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Javascripts take 1.7 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-87%

Potential reduce by 330.3 kB

Original 380.5 kB
After minification 366.3 kB
After compression 50.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 330.3 kB or 87% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 34.4 kB

Original 1.3 MB
After minification 1.3 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Contact Instruments images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-61%

Potential reduce by 1.0 MB

Original 1.7 MB
After minification 1.6 MB
After compression 666.8 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 1.0 MB or 61% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-86%

Potential reduce by 862.9 kB

Original 1.0 MB
After minification 987.7 kB
After compression 139.6 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Contactinstruments.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 862.9 kB or 86% of the original size.

Requests Now

131

After Optimization

The browser has sent 131 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Contact Instruments. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 75 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 40 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.