Tools & Wizards About Us

Report Summary

  • 60

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    75% of other websites

  • 84

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 56% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 97

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    91% of websites

cooperandgraham.com

Cooper & Graham | Luxury Bath & Kitchen Fixtures & Fittings

Page Load Speed

1.3 sec in total

First Response

122 ms

Resources Loaded

727 ms

Page Rendered

494 ms

About Website

Click here to check amazing Cooper And Graham content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about cooperandgraham.com

Cooper & Graham offers modern luxury bath & kitchen collections for residential and commercial applications

Visit cooperandgraham.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Cooperandgraham.com page load time and found that the first response time was 122 ms and then it took 1.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 25% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

cooperandgraham.com performance score

60

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value1.5 s

95/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value5.6 s

17/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value3.3 s

91/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value560 ms

53/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.083

94/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value5.8 s

67/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

cooperandgraham.com

122 ms

cooperandgraham.com

68 ms

js

388 ms

bootstrap.css

31 ms

font-awesome.5.12.0.min.css

50 ms

Our browser made a total of 37 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 97% of them (36 requests) were addressed to the original Cooperandgraham.com, 3% (1 request) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (388 ms) relates to the external source Googletagmanager.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 41.0 kB (32%)

Content Size

128.2 kB

After Optimization

87.2 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of Cooperandgraham.com main page is 128.2 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 83.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 36.4 kB

  • Original 43.7 kB
  • After minification 43.7 kB
  • After compression 7.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 36.4 kB or 83% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-5%

Potential reduce by 4.6 kB

  • Original 83.8 kB
  • After minification 79.2 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Cooper And Graham images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 17 B

  • Original 655 B
  • After minification 655 B
  • After compression 638 B

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 15 (58%)

Requests Now

26

After Optimization

11

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 26 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Cooper And Graham. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 10 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

Accessibility Review

cooperandgraham.com accessibility score

84

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

High

Some elements have a [tabindex] value greater than 0

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

cooperandgraham.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

cooperandgraham.com SEO score

97

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Cooperandgraham.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Cooperandgraham.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Cooper And Graham. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: