Tools & Wizards About Us

Report Summary

  • 59

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    74% of other websites

  • 76

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 42% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 86

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    60% of websites

counterpain.net

Counterpain Hot Cool oder Plus analgetischer Balsam von Taisho – Counterpain von der Firma Taisho

Page Load Speed

20.1 sec in total

First Response

449 ms

Resources Loaded

19.4 sec

Page Rendered

229 ms

About Website

Click here to check amazing Counterpain content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about counterpain.net

Taisho Counterpain Salben wie Hot, Cool und Plus, ist einer der Besten gegen Gelenk- und Muskelschmerzen. Unser Dreierpack-Angebot ist die günstigste Variante!

Visit counterpain.net

Key Findings

We analyzed Counterpain.net page load time and found that the first response time was 449 ms and then it took 19.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 95% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

counterpain.net performance score

59

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.9 s

52/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.0 s

48/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value5.8 s

50/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value420 ms

65/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.004

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value11.5 s

18/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

counterpain.net

449 ms

counterpain.net

1893 ms

style.min.css

1425 ms

counterpain_top-banner-de.jpg

961 ms

woocommerce-layout.css

558 ms

Our browser made a total of 67 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 90% of them (60 requests) were addressed to the original Counterpain.net, 6% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 1% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (12.3 sec) belongs to the original domain Counterpain.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 1.1 MB (65%)

Content Size

1.7 MB

After Optimization

616.6 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Counterpain.net main page is 1.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. CSS take 810.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 53.0 kB

  • Original 64.5 kB
  • After minification 60.3 kB
  • After compression 11.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 53.0 kB or 82% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 58 B

  • Original 325.1 kB
  • After minification 325.0 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Counterpain images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-75%

Potential reduce by 410.4 kB

  • Original 548.1 kB
  • After minification 454.8 kB
  • After compression 137.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 410.4 kB or 75% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 668.0 kB

  • Original 810.3 kB
  • After minification 728.7 kB
  • After compression 142.3 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Counterpain.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 668.0 kB or 82% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 39 (66%)

Requests Now

59

After Optimization

20

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 59 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Counterpain. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 23 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 18 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

Accessibility Review

counterpain.net accessibility score

76

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

ARIA IDs are not unique

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).

Best Practices

counterpain.net best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

counterpain.net SEO score

86

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    DE

  • Language Claimed

    DE

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Counterpain.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that German is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Counterpain.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Counterpain. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: