Tools & Wizards About Us

Report Summary

  • 47

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    65% of other websites

  • 84

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 56% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    94% of websites

crescent.network

Crescent Network: Unlocking Limitless DeFi Possibilities

Page Load Speed

531 ms in total

First Response

35 ms

Resources Loaded

436 ms

Page Rendered

60 ms

About Website

Welcome to crescent.network homepage info - get ready to check Crescent best content for Japan right away, or after learning these important things about crescent.network

Crescent Network provides multi-chain asset exchange and capital-efficient liquidity incentivization.

Visit crescent.network

Key Findings

We analyzed Crescent.network page load time and found that the first response time was 35 ms and then it took 496 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 10% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

crescent.network performance score

47

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value1.1 s

99/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.6 s

62/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value6.7 s

36/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,940 ms

8/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.014

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value14.2 s

9/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

crescent.network

35 ms

crescent.network

18 ms

universal.js

40 ms

js

74 ms

pixel.js

28 ms

Our browser made a total of 9 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 44% of them (4 requests) were addressed to the original Crescent.network, 33% (3 requests) were made to Static.mailerlite.com and 11% (1 request) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (172 ms) belongs to the original domain Crescent.network.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 7.7 kB (8%)

Content Size

92.4 kB

After Optimization

84.7 kB

  • HTML
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Crescent.network main page is 92.4 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only 5% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 84.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-62%

Potential reduce by 2.2 kB

  • Original 3.6 kB
  • After minification 3.6 kB
  • After compression 1.4 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 2.2 kB or 62% of the original size.

JavaScript Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 1.4 kB

  • Original 84.4 kB
  • After minification 84.4 kB
  • After compression 83.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-92%

Potential reduce by 4.1 kB

  • Original 4.5 kB
  • After minification 423 B
  • After compression 335 B

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Crescent.network needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 4.1 kB or 92% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 4 (57%)

Requests Now

7

After Optimization

3

  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 7 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Crescent. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 5 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

Accessibility Review

crescent.network accessibility score

84

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

crescent.network best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

crescent.network SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    “UTF-8”

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Crescent.network can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Crescent.network main page’s claimed encoding is “utf-8”. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Crescent. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: