Tools & Wizards About Us

Report Summary

  • 4

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    20% of other websites

  • 76

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 42% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 86

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    60% of websites

crew-tool.com

Leading Aerospace Sealant Tools | Crew Tool

Page Load Speed

5.7 sec in total

First Response

100 ms

Resources Loaded

5.1 sec

Page Rendered

475 ms

About Website

Click here to check amazing Crew Tool content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about crew-tool.com

Leading aerospace sealant tool manufacturer. Trusted by top aircraft companies. High-quality products, fast shipping. Contact us now!

Visit crew-tool.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Crew-tool.com page load time and found that the first response time was 100 ms and then it took 5.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

crew-tool.com performance score

4

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value6.4 s

2/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value7.9 s

3/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value14.8 s

1/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value2,760 ms

3/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.589

11/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value20.2 s

2/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

crew-tool.com

100 ms

style.min.css

25 ms

style-wpzoom-social-icons.css

45 ms

styles.css

63 ms

woo-custom-related-products-public.css

69 ms

Our browser made a total of 238 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 85% of them (202 requests) were addressed to the original Crew-tool.com, 8% (19 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 2% (5 requests) were made to Use.fontawesome.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (824 ms) belongs to the original domain Crew-tool.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 728.8 kB (8%)

Content Size

8.9 MB

After Optimization

8.2 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Crew-tool.com main page is 8.9 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only a small number of websites need less resources to load. Images take 7.7 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-94%

Potential reduce by 584.8 kB

  • Original 622.4 kB
  • After minification 614.0 kB
  • After compression 37.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 584.8 kB or 94% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 122.7 kB

  • Original 7.7 MB
  • After minification 7.5 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Crew Tool images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 3.8 kB

  • Original 382.1 kB
  • After minification 382.1 kB
  • After compression 378.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-6%

Potential reduce by 17.5 kB

  • Original 281.0 kB
  • After minification 280.9 kB
  • After compression 263.5 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Crew-tool.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 64 (30%)

Requests Now

214

After Optimization

150

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 214 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Crew Tool. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 42 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 24 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

Accessibility Review

crew-tool.com accessibility score

76

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles

High

Elements with an ARIA [role] that require children to contain a specific [role] are missing some or all of those required children.

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

crew-tool.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

crew-tool.com SEO score

86

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Crew-tool.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Crew-tool.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Crew Tool. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: