Tools & Wizards About Us

Report Summary

  • 9

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    23% of other websites

  • 79

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 47% of websites

  • 50

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    19% of websites

  • 60

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    23% of websites

critical-infrastructure-protection.cioreview.com

Critical Infrastructure Protection Security Solutions | CIOReview

Page Load Speed

4.3 sec in total

First Response

41 ms

Resources Loaded

4 sec

Page Rendered

196 ms

About Website

Welcome to critical-infrastructure-protection.cioreview.com homepage info - get ready to check Critical Infrastructure Protection CIOReview best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about critical-infrastructure-protection.cioreview.com

CIOReview is a leading print and digital magazine that bridges the gap between enterprise technology vendors & buyers. As a knowledge network, CIOReview offers a range of in-depth CIO/CXO articles, wh...

Visit critical-infrastructure-protection.cioreview.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Critical-infrastructure-protection.cioreview.com page load time and found that the first response time was 41 ms and then it took 4.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

critical-infrastructure-protection.cioreview.com performance score

9

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value5.1 s

9/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value12.1 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value12.1 s

3/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value3,200 ms

2/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.277

44/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value19.7 s

2/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

critical-infrastructure-protection.cioreview.com

41 ms

critical-infrastructure-protection.cioreview.com

1554 ms

gpt.js

408 ms

js

206 ms

atrk.js

62 ms

Our browser made a total of 125 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 14% of them (18 requests) were addressed to the original Critical-infrastructure-protection.cioreview.com, 30% (38 requests) were made to Cioreview.com and 14% (18 requests) were made to Magazine.cioreview.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.6 sec) belongs to the original domain Critical-infrastructure-protection.cioreview.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 720.1 kB (39%)

Content Size

1.8 MB

After Optimization

1.1 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Critical-infrastructure-protection.cioreview.com main page is 1.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Javascripts take 752.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-88%

Potential reduce by 214.8 kB

  • Original 243.7 kB
  • After minification 132.0 kB
  • After compression 28.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 111.8 kB, which is 46% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 214.8 kB or 88% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-9%

Potential reduce by 63.5 kB

  • Original 673.2 kB
  • After minification 609.7 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Critical Infrastructure Protection CIOReview images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-39%

Potential reduce by 297.1 kB

  • Original 752.7 kB
  • After minification 752.6 kB
  • After compression 455.5 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 297.1 kB or 39% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 144.6 kB

  • Original 176.7 kB
  • After minification 170.9 kB
  • After compression 32.1 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Critical-infrastructure-protection.cioreview.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 144.6 kB or 82% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 69 (62%)

Requests Now

112

After Optimization

43

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 112 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Critical Infrastructure Protection CIOReview. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 43 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 22 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

Accessibility Review

critical-infrastructure-protection.cioreview.com accessibility score

79

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

critical-infrastructure-protection.cioreview.com best practices score

50

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

High

Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools

SEO Factors

critical-infrastructure-protection.cioreview.com SEO score

60

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

High

Page is blocked from indexing

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document doesn't use legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Critical-infrastructure-protection.cioreview.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Critical-infrastructure-protection.cioreview.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Critical Infrastructure Protection CIOReview. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: