Access criticanarede.com. Crítica: Revista de filosofia

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value1.7 s

92/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value1.7 s

99/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value2.3 s

99/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,490 ms

14/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value7.5 s

48/100

10%

criticanarede.com

169 ms

style.css

64 ms

adsbygoogle.js

8 ms

addthis_widget.js

20 ms

ca-pub-7685417891340699.js

109 ms

Our browser made a total of 80 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 71% of them (57 requests) were addressed to the original Criticanarede.com, 6% (5 requests) were made to Pagead2.googlesyndication.com and 6% (5 requests) were made to S7.addthis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (915 ms) belongs to the original domain Criticanarede.com.

Content Size

3.4 MB

After Optimization

2.4 MB

In fact, the total size of Criticanarede.com main page is 3.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.5 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-78%

Potential reduce by 129.7 kB

Original 166.0 kB
After minification 159.9 kB
After compression 36.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 129.7 kB or 78% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-14%

Potential reduce by 343.3 kB

Original 2.5 MB
After minification 2.1 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Criticanare De needs image optimization as it can save up to 343.3 kB or 14% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-63%

Potential reduce by 469.1 kB

Original 743.1 kB
After minification 741.9 kB
After compression 274.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 469.1 kB or 63% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-74%

Potential reduce by 2.4 kB

Original 3.2 kB
After minification 2.4 kB
After compression 821 B

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Criticanarede.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 2.4 kB or 74% of the original size.

Requests Now

After Optimization

The browser has sent 76 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Criticanare De. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 12 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.