Report Summary

  • 23

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    41% of other websites

  • 42

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 19% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 88

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    65% of websites

cross.co.id

Evercoss | Let's Connect! | Smartphone For Everyone

Page Load Speed

8.1 sec in total

First Response

860 ms

Resources Loaded

6.8 sec

Page Rendered

448 ms

About Website

Visit cross.co.id now to see the best up-to-date Cross content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about cross.co.id

EVERCOSS, smartphone lokal no 1 di Indonesia. Service Center EVERCOSS tersebar banyak diberbagai kota-kota besar Indonesia. Let's connect

Visit cross.co.id

Key Findings

We analyzed Cross.co.id page load time and found that the first response time was 860 ms and then it took 7.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 85% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

cross.co.id performance score

23

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value6.5 s

2/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value13.8 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value11.3 s

5/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value470 ms

61/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.523

15/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value12.6 s

14/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

cross.co.id

860 ms

evercoss.com

1375 ms

bootstrap.min.css

1159 ms

font-awesome.css

718 ms

evercoss.css

1277 ms

Our browser made a total of 53 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 2% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Cross.co.id, 77% (41 requests) were made to Evercoss.com and 4% (2 requests) were made to Maxcdn.bootstrapcdn.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (3.7 sec) relates to the external source Evercoss.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 573.8 kB (12%)

Content Size

4.7 MB

After Optimization

4.1 MB

In fact, the total size of Cross.co.id main page is 4.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 4.0 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-87%

Potential reduce by 65.5 kB

  • Original 74.9 kB
  • After minification 58.7 kB
  • After compression 9.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 16.3 kB, which is 22% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 65.5 kB or 87% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 32.2 kB

  • Original 4.0 MB
  • After minification 3.9 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Cross images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-67%

Potential reduce by 210.7 kB

  • Original 312.4 kB
  • After minification 282.0 kB
  • After compression 101.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 210.7 kB or 67% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-86%

Potential reduce by 265.4 kB

  • Original 308.5 kB
  • After minification 266.5 kB
  • After compression 43.0 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Cross.co.id needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 265.4 kB or 86% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 20 (41%)

Requests Now

49

After Optimization

29

The browser has sent 49 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Cross. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 13 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 9 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

cross.co.id accessibility score

42

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

cross.co.id best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

cross.co.id SEO score

88

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Cross.co.id can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Cross.co.id main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Cross. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: