Access cubla.com. Cubla Incorporated

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.3 s

41/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value10.6 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.7 s

68/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value870 ms

33/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.007

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value10.1 s

26/100

10%

www.cubla.com

71 ms

eda7xwV6MpPgIcccHdvzNKgmqadRl01SZJWQzv5-X53feC3IfFHN4UJLFRbh52jhWDjDZQBKwRJhZe9XFA4Rwh9tjAmqjRjtjy74MkG0jAFu-WsoShFGZAsude80ZkoRdhXCHKoyjamTiY8Djhy8ZYmC-Ao1Oco8if37OcBDOcu8OfG0ZhNCZfu1Scmo-eNudcbldesDZPoDSWmyScmDSeBRZPoRdhXCHKoDSWmyScmDSeBRZWFR-emqiAUTdcS0jhNlOeBRiA8XpWFR-emqiAUTdcS0jhNlOeBRiA8XpWFR-emqiAUTdcS0dcmXOeBDOcu8OeFujcUyOcFzdPU1dhUqOAikZW8Gdam0ZfuCZYF8O1FUiABkZWF3jAF8OcFzdPUCdhFydeyzSabCSaBujW48SagyjhmDjhy8ZYmC-Ao1OcFzdPUaiaS0jAFu-WsoShFGZAsude80ZkoRdhXCiaiaOcBRiA8XpWFR-emqiAUTdcS0dcmXOYiaikoySkolZPUaiaS0jamKdeI0jhNlOYiaiko1dhUqOAikZW8Gdam0ZfuCZYF8O1FUiABkZWF3jAF8OcFzdPUaiaS0SaBujW48SagyjhmDjhy8ZYmC-Ao1OcFzdPJOda43-emuSku3ScvKeAo8iA9l-eBySku1ScNXZWFnOAsTSagCjWq7f6Rnz6IbMg6IJMJ7f6RTz6IbMg6YJMJ7f6R7z6IbMg65JMJ7f6RelMJbMs6IJMJ7f6RJlMJbMs6BJMJ7f6RwlMJbMs6YJMJ7f6RYlMJbMs65JMJ7f6R4lMJbMs6VJMJ7f6RFlMJbMs6sJMHbM-dkyTve.js

85 ms

legacy.js

60 ms

modern.js

69 ms

extract-css-runtime-139f22ec9f658737e662-min.en-US.js

59 ms

Our browser made a total of 26 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 4% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Cubla.com, 38% (10 requests) were made to Use.typekit.net and 35% (9 requests) were made to Assets.squarespace.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (218 ms) relates to the external source Assets.squarespace.com.

Content Size

1.5 MB

After Optimization

1.3 MB

In fact, the total size of Cubla.com main page is 1.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 1.0 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-86%

Potential reduce by 112.1 kB

Original 130.9 kB
After minification 121.9 kB
After compression 18.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 112.1 kB or 86% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-7%

Potential reduce by 20.5 kB

Original 304.9 kB
After minification 284.4 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Cubla images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 5.4 kB

Original 1.0 MB
After minification 1.0 MB
After compression 1.0 MB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

Original 21 B

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered.

Requests Now

After Optimization

The browser has sent 16 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Cubla. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 11 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.