Access cucumall.com. Cucumall Group ➤ Worldwide price comparison service

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.4 s

71/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value5.4 s

21/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value2.9 s

94/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value170 ms

92/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value5.8 s

66/100

10%

cucumall.com

255 ms

cucumall.com

541 ms

main.min.css

375 ms

jquery.min.js

530 ms

core.min.js

405 ms

Our browser made a total of 13 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 15% of them (2 requests) were addressed to the original Cucumall.com, 38% (5 requests) were made to Js5.cucumall.com and 38% (5 requests) were made to Css5.cucumall.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (541 ms) belongs to the original domain Cucumall.com.

Content Size

177.0 kB

After Optimization

146.4 kB

In fact, the total size of Cucumall.com main page is 177.0 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 15% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 134.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-71%

Potential reduce by 7.1 kB

Original 10.0 kB
After minification 9.2 kB
After compression 3.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 7.1 kB or 71% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-22%

Potential reduce by 6.6 kB

Original 29.5 kB
After minification 22.9 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Cucumall needs image optimization as it can save up to 6.6 kB or 22% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-12%

Potential reduce by 16.6 kB

Original 134.4 kB
After minification 134.4 kB
After compression 117.8 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 16.6 kB or 12% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-10%

Potential reduce by 286 B

Original 3.0 kB
After minification 3.0 kB
After compression 2.7 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Cucumall.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Now

After Optimization

The browser has sent 11 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Cucumall. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 6 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.