Report Summary

  • 27

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    46% of other websites

  • 87

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 66% of websites

  • 58

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    20% of websites

  • 71

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    30% of websites

remote-site-monitoring.com.clearwebstats.com

Remote-site-monitoring - remote-site-monitoring.com : Didactum | Remote Site Monitoring

Page Load Speed

1.5 sec in total

First Response

268 ms

Resources Loaded

800 ms

Page Rendered

393 ms

About Website

Visit remote-site-monitoring.com.clearwebstats.com now to see the best up-to-date Remote Site Monitoring Com Clearwebstats content for India and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about remote-site-monitoring.com.clearwebstats.com

This web site and our discussion forward focuses directly on remote site monitoring. We will use remote cellular sites or telecom tower sites in our example.

Visit remote-site-monitoring.com.clearwebstats.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Remote-site-monitoring.com.clearwebstats.com page load time and found that the first response time was 268 ms and then it took 1.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 25% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

remote-site-monitoring.com.clearwebstats.com performance score

27

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.4 s

70/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value10.8 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value6.1 s

45/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value2,270 ms

6/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.089

92/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value20.4 s

2/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

remote-site-monitoring.com.clearwebstats.com

268 ms

bootstrap.min.css

68 ms

style_frontend.css

108 ms

jquery.min.js

61 ms

bootstrap.min.js

86 ms

Our browser made a total of 64 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 5% of them (3 requests) were addressed to the original Remote-site-monitoring.com.clearwebstats.com, 36% (23 requests) were made to Clearwebstats.com and 17% (11 requests) were made to Google.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (365 ms) relates to the external source Google.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 484.4 kB (55%)

Content Size

880.3 kB

After Optimization

395.9 kB

In fact, the total size of Remote-site-monitoring.com.clearwebstats.com main page is 880.3 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 770.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-81%

Potential reduce by 43.1 kB

  • Original 53.5 kB
  • After minification 53.4 kB
  • After compression 10.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 43.1 kB or 81% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 117 B

  • Original 33.3 kB
  • After minification 33.2 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Remote Site Monitoring Com Clearwebstats images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-57%

Potential reduce by 438.3 kB

  • Original 770.5 kB
  • After minification 770.3 kB
  • After compression 332.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 438.3 kB or 57% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-13%

Potential reduce by 2.9 kB

  • Original 23.0 kB
  • After minification 22.6 kB
  • After compression 20.1 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Remote-site-monitoring.com.clearwebstats.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 2.9 kB or 13% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 41 (79%)

Requests Now

52

After Optimization

11

The browser has sent 52 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Remote Site Monitoring Com Clearwebstats. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 18 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

remote-site-monitoring.com.clearwebstats.com accessibility score

87

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).

Best Practices

remote-site-monitoring.com.clearwebstats.com best practices score

58

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

remote-site-monitoring.com.clearwebstats.com SEO score

71

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Remote-site-monitoring.com.clearwebstats.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Remote-site-monitoring.com.clearwebstats.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Remote Site Monitoring Com Clearwebstats. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: